Traduction de «operative part a report » (Anglais → Français) :

function part | operation part | operator part

operative part of a report

operative part of the judgment | operative provisions of the judgment

Canada-US Regulatory Co-operation - Charting a Path Forward: Interim Report

terms of a judgment [ operative part of a judgment ]

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

develop operational reports on airport lighting system activities | produce airport lighting reports | develop operational reports on airport lighting system inspections and interventions | produce airport lighting system reports

compose signalling reports | develop signalling operations communications | write signalling operations reports | write signalling reports

Definition: The main features are multiple, recurrent and frequently changing physical symptoms of at least two years' duration. Most patients have a long and complicated history of contact with both primary and specialist medical care services, during which many negative investigations or fruitless exploratory operations may have been carried out. Symptoms may be referred to any part or system of the body. The course of the disorder is chronic and fluctuating, and is often associated with disruption of social, in ...[+++]terpersonal, and family behaviour. Short-lived (less than two years) and less striking symptom patterns should be classified under undifferentiated somatoform disorder (F45.1). | Briquet's disorder Multiple psychosomatic disorder

Then we would be able to arrive at the concluding operative part of the report.

the report on the chemical safety and the analysis of the possible replacements for the substance Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) referred to in point 1 of the present operative part, in a version which is more detailed than that defined in point 1;

the reports on the chemical safety and the analyses of the possible replacements for the substance Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) submitted by Arkema France, Grupa Azoty Zakłady Azotowe Kędzierzyn and Vinyloop Ferrara and which are the subject of the ECHA Decisions AFA-C-0000004280-84-09/F, AFA-C-0000004275-75-09/F and AFA-C-0000004151-87-08/F of 24 January 2014, in so far as those documents are identical to those protected under point 1 of the present operative part.

Annuls point 2 of the operative part of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 June 2011 (Case R 1432/2010-1) and point 2 of the operative part of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 May 2011 (Case R 1310/2010-1);