Traduction de «other member states » (Anglais → Français) :

1. If, in a search with an unidentified DNA profile, no match has been found in the national database or a match has been found with an unidentified DNA profile, the unidentified DNA profile may then be transmitted to all other Member States' databases and if, in a search with this unidentified DNA profile, matches are found with reference DNA profiles and/or unidentified DNA profiles in other Member States' databases, these matches shall be automatically communicated and the DNA reference data transmitted to the requesting Member State; if no matches can be found in other Member States' databases, this shall be automatically communicat ...[+++]ed to the requesting Member State.

Cases where cross-border services are rendered more costly or less attractive occur when nationals or residents of other Member States are prevented from benefiting from preferential tariffs and prices or promotional offers in a Member State, or when citizens have to pay higher taxes on services from other Member States, cannot benefit from tax deductions on services from other Member States or do not receive subsidies for services in or from other Member States.

(7) With regard to collective portfolio management (management of unit trusts/common funds and investment companies), the authorisation granted to a management company authorised in its home Member State should permit the company to carry on in host Member States the following activities: to distribute the units of the harmonised unit trusts/common funds managed by the company in its home Member State; to distribute the shares of the harmonised investment companies, managed by such a company; to perform all the ...[+++]other functions and tasks included in the activity of collective portfolio management; to manage the assets of investment companies incorporated in Member States other than its home Member State; to perform, on the basis of mandates, on behalf of management companies incorporated in Member States other than its home Member State, the functions included in the activity of collective portfolio management.

The areas in which the widest divergences were found to exist include: t product lists: differences in content and presentation; for example, the lists and any amendments are not published simultaneously in all the Member States; e country lists: some Member States publish a list of proscribed destinations, others publish a list of "special facility" destinations, while a third group publishes neither white nor black lists; y export licences: all Member States issue validated individual licences and most issue simplified licences, but the conditions of issue, the physical appearance and other features of the licences vary significantly; a penalties: although any breach of the regulations is a punishable offence in every Member State, th ...[+++]e fines and terms of imprisonment differ considerably; depending on the country, the maximum fine ranges from some ECU 16 000 to an unlimited amount, and the term of imprisonment from two to seven years; information exchange and administrative cooperation between Member States: although informal but effective arrangements exist for the exchange of information between some Member States, there is no official, Communitybwide intelligence network; an effort is being made in some Member States to computerize administrative procedures, but their compatibility both within the Member States concerned and between them and other Member States is difficult to assess; it would appear, moreover, that nothing has been done to computerize the issuing of export licences.

The Council: 1. reaffirms the importance of reinforcing coordination in development cooperation between the Community and the Member States as stated in Article 130x of the Treaty on European Union and in accordance with the principle of complementarity of policies set out in Article 130u; 2. notes with interest the initial results of reinforced coordination in the six pilot countries, in particular the progress made in several countries in reciprocal exchange of information between the representatives of the Member States and the Community and the consequent greater transparency of sectoral and ...[+++] regional activities of the Commission and Member States; 3. notes, however, the disparity between one country and another in the functioning of coordination and observes that the process is hindered by a number of problems relating, inter alia, to lack of staff, links with other coordination bodies and the involvement of beneficiary countries; 4. also emphasizes, in view of the differing economic and social situations in the various countries, the advantages of coherent analysis and exchange of information between the Member States and the Commission; 5. stresses the importance of Community coordination and reiterates the main objectives, which are: to strengthen the capacity of the recipient country to assume responsibility for and ownership of its own development strategies and programmes; to reduce the administrative burden on beneficiary countries with the aim of encouraging strengthened capacity; to increase the effectiveness of development cooperation by the Community and its Member States and providers of funds as a whole; to ensure consistency of the cooperation activities of the Community and its Member States with the common political guidelines adopted by the Council and to ensure complementarity of the various measures within the framework of a single strategy developed by the beneficiary country itself; to optimize the European Union's presence in develo ...

ANNEX I Important measures taken in relation to BSE (a) Community measures (i) export ban on live animals from the UK to the other Member States with the exception of calves under six months under the condition that they are slaughtered before the age of six months (March 1990); (ii) export ban on specified offals (brains, spinal cord, thymus, tonsils, spleen and intestines) from the UK to the other Member States (April 1990); (iii) export of meat from the UK to the other Member States: - from animals under the age of 30 months: no restrictions (first measure 1 March 1990 - latest decision February 1995); - from animals over the age o ...[+++]f 30 months coming from a herd with no case of BSE during the last six years: no restrictions (decisions as above); - from animals over the age of 30 months coming from a herd with a case of BSE during the last six years: to be accompanied by a health certificate stating "fresh deboned bovine meat in the form of muscle from which the adherent tissues, including obvious nervous and lymphatic tissues, have been removed" (decisions as above); (iv) ban in the Community on the feeding of mammalian protein to ruminants (June 1994); (v) tightening of rules on rendering of ruminant waste in order to inactivate the BSE agent (June 1994) (b) UK measures: (i) ban on the feeding of ruminant protein to ruminants (July 1988); (ii) ban on specified bovine offals (SBOs) (November 1989); ( i i i ) strengthening of the specified bovine offals ban (August 1995); (iv) ban on the feeding of mammalian protein to all farm animals (March 1996) (c) Member State level: - import ban on meat- and bone-meal from the United Kingdom (d) Community export ban on bovine animals, bovine meat and meat products, etc., and on mammalian-derived meat- and bone-meal from the UK to other Member States and third countries (March 1996).