Traduction de «provide instruction on tourism principles » (Anglais → Français) :

Such recognition of their European vocation could create a similar dynamic to that created by the success of the European Capitals of Culture, which act as a catalyst for local development and tourism by implementing an ambitious and attractive annual cultural programme on a European scale.[11] This experiment may also be extended to cover those regions forming part of the 'Natura 2000' network, which cover more than 17 % of European territory and are areas of interest for tourism, provided that the principles of conservation ...[+++] for the natural environments concerned are respected.

In accordance with the objectives set out above, and taking full account of the new institutional framework provided by the Lisbon Treaty, the European Commission is convinced that a number of European or multinational actions can be carried out while respecting the principle of subsidiarity defined by the Treaty and the competence of the Member States in the field of tourism.

2. Food business operators shall decide the appropriate sampling frequencies, except where Annex I provides for specific sampling frequencies, in which case the sampling frequency shall be at least that provided for in Annex I. Food business operators shall make this decision in the context of their procedures based on HACCP principles and good hygiene practice, taking into account the instructions for use of the foodstuff.

Nevertheless, the Treaties provide no specific legal base for a Community policy on tourism, despite the fact that our Parliament has been calling for such a policy for a considerable amount of time in order to give the Community major scope for intervention whilst respecting the principle of subsidiarity.

In responding to this request the Commission tends to recall the principle of subsidiarity which is the bottom line for all initiatives, since the Treaties provide no legal basis for tourism.

8. Notes the Secretary-General's statement that at present no disciplinary proceedings are pending within Parliament's administration; welcomes the fact that on 1 December 1999, i.e. even before the deliberations on the discharge for 1998, the Bureau, at the proposal of the Secretary-General, started an administrative inquiry; notes the Bureau decision of 13 June 2000, in connection with the Frederiksen case, not to seek redress as provided for by Article 22 of the Staff Regulations; notes that this decision is based on the consideration that the administrative inquiry did not reveal evidence of "serious misconduct" by individuals as ...[+++]referred to in Article 22 of the Staff Regulations; points out, however, that the administrative inquiry revealed both problems with internal decision-making procedures and a tendency to neglect risks associated with court cases in relation to alleged considerations of "principle"; concludes from the course of events that it would have been appropriate to review the case and reappraise the risks associated with legal proceedings at a considerably earlier stage; recalls paragraph 23 of its above-mentioned resolution of 13 April 2000, calling on the Legal Service to inform the Bureau about the risks of court cases before the Bureau takes its decisions, particularly in the light of previous judgements on staff matters; welcomes the Bureau decision of 13 June 2000 instructing Vice-Presidents Lienemann and Provan to examine whether further internal administrative reforms are needed in order to avoid similar outcomes; instructs its Bureau to inform the competent committees about its conclusions on this matter;