Traduction de «schedule periodic reviews » (Anglais → Français) :

These competencies undergo periodic reviews, including one scheduled for later in 2005.

That members of the Committee be given a period of one week to review the report entitled Prescription Drugs Part 1 - Common Drug Review, previously adopted by the Committee in the First Session, 39th Parliament on June 13, 2007; and that the matter of the adoption of the report in the current session, and its presentation in the House, be taken up at the next scheduled Committee meeting following the one week review period.

4. If no air carrier has commenced or is about to commence scheduled air services on a route in accordance with the public service obligation which has been imposed on that route, the Member State concerned may limit access to the scheduled air services on that route to only one air carrier for a period of up to four years, after which the situation shall be reviewed.

4. If no air carrier has commenced or is about to commence scheduled air services on a route in accordance with the public service obligation which has been imposed on that route, the Member State concerned may limit access to the scheduled air services on that route to only one air carrier for a period of up to four years, after which the situation shall be reviewed.

In conclusion, SARM's recommendations to the standing committee are: disregard the proposed policy statement and amend the national transportation policy statement to include a secure transportation system that respects the environment; treat railway sidings, switches, and related infrastructure in rural areas in the same manner as they are treated in the metropolitan areas; retain existing final offer arbitration provisions and reject the proposed captivity test; and adopt case-by-case reverse onus running rights on the principle that “any person” may apply to the agency for the right to solicit and carry traffic located along the tracks served by another railroad; reverse onus, where the railway may prove the application is not in the ...[+++] public interest; and access fees based on the host railway's cost of providing service plus a reasonable return on investment; if running rights are not adopted, then costing reviews, performed every four years, should be reinstated, and subsection 150(5) regarding the use of the industrial development fund as a railway revenue reduction should be removed; keep existing CLR provisions, with the addition of an amendment that excludes the requirement for an agreement with the connecting carrier as a condition to obtaining that relief; retain the current statutory review period; amend schedule 1 to include the Northgate subdivision.

It could also be that in connection with the mid-term review of Category 1, scheduled for the year 2003, it will be proposed that these additional appropriations be financed over the entire period.