Traduction de «to delist a brand » (Anglais → Français) :

Enterprise Europe Network Number of partnership agreements signed Increased recognized Network brand and brand Culture (e.g. brand awareness among SME population) Clients satisfaction rate (% SMEs stating satisfaction, added-value of specific service) Number of SMEs receiving support services Number of SMEs participating in brokerage events and company missions || Enterprise Europe Network Partnership agreements signed: 1.950 (2010) Increased recognized Network brand and brand Culture: not measured yet Clients satisfaction rate (% SMEs stating satisfaction, added-value of specific service): 78% Number of SMEs receiving support services: ...[+++]435.000 (2010) Number of SMEs participating in brokerage events and company missions: 45.000 (2010) || Enterprise Europe Network Partnership agreements signed: 3.000/year Increased recognized Network brand and brand Culture: 30% of SMES reached Clients satisfaction rate (% SMEs stating satisfaction, added-value of specific service): >80% Number of SMEs receiving support services 500.000/year Number of SMEs participating in brokerage events and company missions: 60.000/year

On the other hand, retailers can delist less known products owned by the same brand.

It was the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe – we in this House remember – that, through one of its then Members, Dick Marty, demanded transparency and the right of defence and which showed the absurdity of this lack of transparency where the effectiveness of listing and delisting was concerned. Listing and delisting were liable to affect innocent people too, people who were unaware of what was going on around them and unable to do anything about a situation that they generally stumbled upon by accident.

Instances such as under the cost selling, threats of delisting, special supermarket taxes for putting certain brands of food on the shelves, listing charges, slotting allowances, retroactive discounts on goods already sold or unjustified high contributions to retailer promotion expenses or insistence on exclusive supply are all addressed in the report.

36. Calls on the Commission to pay greater attention to the issue of delisting and to submit a legislative proposal for future harmonisation at EU level; notes that, while delisting is possible in the Member States, it involves enormous bureaucratic and legal cost for the businesses concerned; calls, therefore, for "going private" to be made possible in future with the minimum of bureaucratic effort, with particular consideration being given to safeguarding the financial interests of the shareholders;

35. Calls on the Commission to pay greater attention to the issue of delisting and to submit a legislative proposal for future harmonisation at EU level; notes that, while delisting is possible in the Member States, it involves enormous bureaucratic and legal cost for the businesses concerned; calls, therefore, for “going private” to be made possible in future with the minimum of bureaucratic effort, with particular consideration being given to safeguarding the financial interests of the shareholders;