Traduction de «trade agreements compliance act » (Anglais → Français) :

See Bill C-2, An Act to implement the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the States of the European Free Trade Association (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland), the Agreement on Agriculture between Canada and the Republic of Iceland, the Agreement on Agriculture between Canada and the Kingdom of Norway and the Agreement on Agriculture between Canada and the Swiss Confederation (the proposed Canada–EFTA Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act).

Bill C-23, An Act to implement the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Colombia, the Agreement on the Environment between Canada and the Republic of Colombia and the Agreement on Labour Cooperation between Canada and the Republic of Colombia (short title: Canada–Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act), was introduced in the House of Commons by the Honourable Stockwell Day, MP, Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway, and received ...[+++]first reading on 26 March 2009 (1)

126. Recalls its above-mentioned resolution of 14 February 2006 regarding future EU policy on the application of human rights clauses in all EU agreements; notes as a first reaction that the Commission outlined several measures to improve the application of the clause, such as gradually extending human rights committees to more third countries; points out that the Council has not yet given a specific reply to the above-mentioned resolution, preferring continued implementation of the clause in the more general foreign policy context; welcomes the fact that head ...[+++]s of Commission delegations in third countries are required, as part of their mandate, to emphasise human rights more specifically; is concerned, however, by the recent Commission proposal to exempt India from the rule that all EU agreements must include a human rights and democracy clause, in the context of the negotiations for the EU-India Free Trade Agreement; considers that such a move would be a retrograde step and could set a worrying precedent for future negotiations on trade agreements; requests, therefore, that the Commission and the Council adopt a clear position on the detailed proposals contained in the above-mentioned resolution of 14 February 2006; stresses in particular the need to introduce a monitoring mechanism, regular assessment of compliance with human rights obligations and a progressive system of penalties for non-compliance in order to ensure proper implementation of the human rights and democracy clause contained in agreements concluded by the EU with third countries;

126. Recalls its above-mentioned resolution of 14 February 2006 regarding future EU policy on the application of human rights clauses in all EU agreements; notes as a first reaction that the Commission outlined several measures to improve the application of the clause, such as gradually extending human rights committees to more third countries; points out that the Council has not yet given a specific reply to the above-mentioned resolution, preferring continued implementation of the clause in the more general foreign policy context; welcomes the fact that head ...[+++]s of Commission delegations in third countries are required, as part of their mandate, to emphasise human rights more specifically; is concerned, however, by the recent Commission proposal to exempt India from the rule that all EU agreements must include a human rights and democracy clause, in the context of the negotiations for the EU-India Free Trade Agreement; considers that such a move would be a retrograde step and could set a worrying precedent for future negotiations on trade agreements; requests, therefore, that the Commission and the Council adopt a clear position on the detailed proposals contained in the above-mentioned resolution of 14 February 2006; stresses in particular the need to introduce a monitoring mechanism, regular assessment of compliance with human rights obligations and a progressive system of penalties for non-compliance in order to ensure proper implementation of the human rights and democracy clause contained in agreements concluded by the EU with third countries;

RETURNS AND REPORTS DEPOSITED WITH THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), a paper deposited with the Clerk of the House was laid upon the Table as follows: by Mr. Martin (Minister of Finance) Report of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal entitled " Reference from the Minister of Finance Pursuant to Section 19 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act Concerning Certain Warp-Knit Fabrics" , dated March 17, 1997, pursuant to the Canada United States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, S. C. 1988, c. ...[+++]65, s. 54. Sessional Paper No. 8560-352-572EE (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Finance)

Garment Factory Ltd. regarding sewing thread" , dated August 20, 1996, pursuant to the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, S. C. 1988, c. 65, s. 54. Sessional Paper No. 8560-352-572S (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Finance) by Mr. Martin (Minister of Finance) Report of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal entitled " Request for Tariff Relief by Camp Mate Limited regarding no-see-um mesh fabric" , dated September 3, 1996, pursuant to the Canada-United States Free Trade ...[+++]ass=yellow2> Agreement Implementation Act, S. C. 1988, c. 65, s. 54. Sessional Paper No. 8560-352-572T (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Finance) by Mr. Martin (Minister of Finance) Report of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal entitled " Request for Tariff Relief by Fantastic-T Knitter Inc; and by B. C.