Translation of "wind-up the arm " (English → French) :

Expo Winding-up Act [ An Act to wind up the Canadian Corporation for the 1967 World Exhibition ]

The Companies Winding Up Act [ An Act respecting the Voluntary Winding Up of Joint Stock Companies ]

Sports Pool and Loto Canada Winding-Up Act [ An Act respecting the winding-up of the Canadian Sports Pool Corporation and Loto Canada Inc. ]

wind-up of the arm

Interim Agreement Between The United States of America and The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on Certain Measures With Respect to the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms | Interim Agreement between the USA and the USSR on Certain Measures with Respect to the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms | Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty | SALT I agreement [Abbr.] | SALT I Interim Agreement [Abbr.]

haul the wind | hug the wind | sail close to the wind

Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty | Treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms | Treaty on the Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms | SALT II [Abbr.]

whipped up by the wind | whipped by the wind | fanned by the wind | pushed by the wind

impact of environmental elements on ship manoeuvrability | influence of wind and currents in the steering of vessels | effect of environmental factors on ship navigation | influence of winds and currents in the steering of ships

educate members of the armed forces | instruct military troops | teach military troops | train military troops

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 62015CA0249 - EN - Case C-249/15: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Wind 1014 GmbH, Kurt Daell v Skatteministeriet (References for a preliminary ruling — Article 56 TFEU — Freedom to provide services — Restrictions — Motor vehicle leased by a resident of one Member State from a leasing company established in another Member State — Registration tax calculated proportionately to the duration of use of the vehicle — Requirement of approval from the national tax authorities before use — Justific ...[+++]ation — Prevention of circumvention of tax rules and fraud or abuse — Safeguarding States’ powers of taxation — Proportionality) // Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Wind 1014 GmbH, Kurt Daell v Skatteministeriet // (Case C-249/15) - ( // ((References for a preliminary ruling - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Motor vehicle leased by a resident of one Member State from a leasing company established in another Member State - Registration tax calculated proportionately to the duration of use of the vehicle - Requirement of approval from the national tax authorities before use - Justification - Prevention of circumvention of tax rules and fraud or abuse - Safeguarding States’ powers of taxation - Proportionality))

(1.2) Where the winding-up of a Canadian corporation (in this subsection referred to as the “subsidiary”) commenced after March 31, 1977 and not less than 90% of the issued shares of each class of the capital stock of the subsidiary were, immediately before the winding-up, owned by another Canadian corporation (in this subsection referred to as the “parent”) and all the shares of the subsidiary that were not owned by the parent immediately before the winding-up were owned at that time by persons with whom the parent was dealing at arm’s length, for the purposes of computing the taxable income of the parent for any taxation year commencin ...[+++]g after the commencement of the winding-up, any net capital loss of the subsidiary for any particular taxation year of the subsidiary (in this subsection referred to as the “subsidiary’s loss year”), to the extent that it

(1.1) Where a Canadian corporation (in this subsection referred to as the “subsidiary”) has been wound up and not less than 90% of the issued shares of each class of the capital stock of the subsidiary were, immediately before the winding-up, owned by another Canadian corporation (in this subsection referred to as the “parent”) and all the shares of the subsidiary that were not owned by the parent immediately before the winding-up were owned at that time by a person or persons with whom the parent was dealing at arm’s length, for the purpose of computing the taxable income of the parent under this Part and the tax payable under Part IV b ...[+++]y the parent for any taxation year commencing after the commencement of the winding-up, such portion of any non-capital loss, restricted farm loss, farm loss or limited partnership loss of the subsidiary as may reasonably be regarded as its loss from carrying on a particular business (in this subsection referred to as the “subsidiary’s loss business”) and any other portion of any non-capital loss or limited partnership loss of the subsidiary as may reasonably be regarded as being derived from any other source or being in respect of a claim made under section 110.5 for any particular taxation year of the subsidiary (in this subsection referred to as the “subsidiary’s loss year”), to the extent that it

88 (1) Where a taxable Canadian corporation (in this subsection referred to as the “subsidiary”) has been wound up after May 6, 1974 and not less than 90% of the issued shares of each class of the capital stock of the subsidiary were, immediately before the winding-up, owned by another taxable Canadian corporation (in this subsection referred to as the “parent”) and all of the shares of the subsidiary that were not owned by the parent immediately before the winding-up were owned at that time by persons with whom the parent was dealing at arm’s length, notwithstanding any other provision of this Act other than subsection 69(11), the follo ...[+++]wing rules apply: