Translation of "execution judge " (English → French) :

interim injunction judge | judge hearing applications for interim relief | judge hearing applications for provisional relief | judge hearing interim injunction proceedings | judge hearing the application for interim relief | judge in interlocutory proceedings | summary trial judge

judge responsible for the execution of sentences

challenge [ challenge to a judge | challenge to a juror | challenge to a lay magistrate | challenge to an arbitrator | challenge to a referee | challenge to a witness | challenge to evidence | challenge to jurors | challenge to testimony | jury challenge | recusal of a judge | recusation of a judge ]

deputy judge [ replacement judge | ad hoc judge | judge ad hoc | person who acts as a judge ]

assess performances | judge the performances | judge performances | judging performances

Regulation respecting the salary of the judges of the Court of the Sessions of the Peace, the Youth Court and the Provincial Court, and the additional remuneration of the chief judges, senior associate chief judges, associate chief judges and coordinating

juvenile court judge [ juvenile-court judge | youth court judge | youth justice court judge ]

executive agency [ Chafea | Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency | EACEA | EACI | EAHC | EASME | Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency | ERCEA | European Research Council Executive Agency | Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation | Executive Agency for Health and Consumers | Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises | INEA | Innovation and Networks Executive Agency | REA | Research Executive Agency | TEN-T EA | Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency ]

legislative-executive relations [ executive-legislative | legislative-executive ]

respects and fully implements the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 3 and 9 December 2015. These require that the three judges that were lawfully nominated in October 2015 by the previous legislature can take up their function of judge in the Constitutional Tribunal, and that the three judges nominated by the new legislature without a valid legal basis do not take up the post of judge without being validly elected; publishes and implements fully the judgment of 9 March 2016 of the Constitutional Tribunal, as well as all subsequent judgments, and ensures that the publication of future judgements is automatic and does not depend on any decisi ...[+++]on of the executive or legislative powers ; ensures that any reform of the Law on the Constitutional Tribunal respects the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal, including the judgments of 3 and 9 December 2015 and the judgment of 9 March 2016, and takes the Opinion of the Venice Commission fully into account; and ensures that the effectiveness of the Constitutional Tribunal as a guarantor of the Constitution is not undermined by new requirements, whether separately or through their combined effect; ensures that the Constitutional Tribunal can review the compatibility of the new law adopted on 22 July 2016 on the Constitutional Tribunal before its entry into force and publish and implement fully the judgment of the Tribunal in that respect.

implement fully the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal of 3 and 9 December 2015. These require that the three judges that were lawfully nominated in October 2015 by the previous legislature can take up their function of judge in the Constitutional Tribunal, and that the three judges nominated by the new legislature without a valid legal basis do not take up the post of judge without being validly elected; publish and implement fully the judgment of 9 March 2016 of the Constitutional Tribunal, as well as all subsequent judgments and ensure that the publication of future judgments is automatic and does not depend on any decisi ...[+++]on of the executive or legislative powers; ensure that any reform of the Law on the Constitutional Tribunal respects the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal, including the judgments of 3 and 9 December 2015 and the judgment of 9 March 2016, and takes the Opinion of the Venice Commission fully into account; ensure that the effectiveness of the Constitutional Tribunal as a guarantor of the Constitution is not undermined by requirements, whether separately or through their combined effect; ensure that the Constitutional Tribunal can review the compatibility of the new law adopted on 22 July 2016 on the Constitutional Tribunal before its entry into force and publish and implement fully the judgment of the Tribunal in that respect; refrain from actions and public statements which could undermine the legitimacy and efficiency of the Constitutional Tribunal.

In addition, before it is transmitted to the executing authority the EIO shall be validated, after examination of its conformity with the conditions for issuing an EIO under this Directive, in particular the conditions set out in Article 6.1, by a judge, court, investigating judge or a public prosecutor in the issuing State.

W. underlining that Belarus remains the only European country still applying the death penalty in practice; noting that both the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the European Union have repeatedly urged Belarus to abolish the death penalty; whereas details about the death penalty in Belarus are secret, there are serious concerns regarding the fairness of trials and, under the Criminal Executive Code, the death penalty is carried out in private by means of shooting, the detention facility administration informs the judge about executions and the judge informs the relatives; whereas the body of an executed person is ...[+++]not given for burial to his or her relatives and the place of burial is not communicated,