Translation of "Conclusions de révision " (French → English) :

1. Consents to conclusion of the revised Memorandum of Understanding;

(13) The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission to update the definitions laid down in this Decision in the light of changes to definitions adopted by the bodies of the UNFCCC or the Kyoto Protocol or other multilateral agreements relevant to climate change concluded by the Union, to amend Annex I to add accounting periods and ensure consistency between those accounting periods and the relevant periods adopted by the bodies of the UNFCCC, or other multilateral agreement relevant to climate change concluded by the Union, to amend Annex II with updated reference levels in accordance with the proposed reference levels submitted by Member St ...[+++]ates subject to corrections made in accordance with this Decision and in the light of changes to reference levels approved by the bodies of the UNFCCC or the Kyoto Protocol, to revise the information specified in Annex III in accordance with scientific progress and in the light of changes adopted by the bodies of the UNFCCC or the Kyoto Protocol or other successor frameworks and to revise the conditions relating to the accounting rules for natural disturbances laid down in this Decision in the light of scientific progress or to reflect revisions to acts adopted by the UNFCCC or Kyoto Protocol bodies.

2. Member States shall notify the Commission of any cross-border agreement by 16 June 2013, for the agreements concluded before that date, and before their conclusion for new or revised agreements between Member States.

On 25 May 2010, the Council adopted Conclusions on the Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (hereinafter the ‘Review Conference’), which was held in Kampala, Uganda, from 31 May to 11 June 2010.

In addition to the Commission’s in-house information sources (joint annual reports, analysis of conclusions of mid-term reviews, and funding proposals and agreements), use was made of other documentation, including assessments by social and economic partners, questionnaires and assessments from the ACP-EU Follow-Up Committee of at the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) and other, very useful documentary and field studies carried out by civil society organisations.

2. Insists on the linkage between that Review, which will deal with consumer contracts, and the work being carried out on all contract law in general within the continuing process to achieve a Frame of Reference in European contract law (CFR), and therefore stresses that the Review and the work on the CFR need to progress in a complementary way, whilst acknowledging that achieving this linkage should not impede or delay the current Review process;