Traduction de «Exploitant nucléaire » (Français → Anglais) :

nuclear plant operator

nuclear operator

DCIS nuclear pleomorphism, grade 2: neither nuclear grade 1 nor nuclear grade 3

Convention on the Liability of Operators of Nuclear Ships

State Committee on Nuclear Power Utilization

nuclear safety [ Euratom inspection | Euratom safeguards | IAEA inspection | nuclear control | reactor safety | safety of nuclear installations | safety of nuclear power stations ]

DCIS nuclear pleomorphism, grade 3: Markedly pleomorphic nuclei, usually >2.5 RBC diameters, with coarse chromatin and multiple nucleoli

In-Service Examination and Testing Requirements for Concrete Containment Structures for CANDU Nuclear Power Plants

Convention on the Liability of Operators of Nuclear Ships

Accident caused by mining and earth-drilling machinery

In case a nuclear incident occurs and if the state guarantee is called, the nuclear operator would however remain liable for nuclear damages and the State could then recover the amounts paid under the guarantee from the nuclear operator.

Under the Belgian law, the liable nuclear operator would have to compensate victims up to €1.2 billion for up to 30 years after a nuclear incident occurred.

The Commission established that the Belgian state guarantee aims to improve compensation of victims of a nuclear incident, without granting any economic advantage to nuclear operators.

(Return tabled) Question No. 465 Ms. Elizabeth May: With regard to the Nuclear Liability and Compensation Act enacted as part of Bill C-22, with particular reference to the government's decision to increase the absolute liability amount and mandatory insurance coverage for nuclear operators to $1 billion: (a) has the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) asked Ontario Power Generation whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage required under the Act at $1 billion, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, i ...[+++]ncluding the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (b) has the DNR asked Bruce Power whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage required under the Act at $1 billion, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (c) has the DNR asked New Brunswick Power whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (d) in the scenario in which the limit on reactor liability is removed while the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator remain at $1 billion, what is the DNR's estimate of the impacts that removing the cap on liability would have on provincial electricity rates, (i) what additional impacts would there be if the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator were increased to $1.5 billion, all other things being equal, (ii) what would the additional impacts be if the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator were increased to $2 billion, all other things being equal; (e) does ...