Traduction de «Forum en ligne du Groupe de travail sur le pourriel » (Français → Anglais) :

B. whereas the institutions of the European Union are contributing to this debate by organising public discussion forums, including on-line forums, in their own working places, as well as at selected venues in the Member States, but the present Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate has not yet reached a wider public in the Union,

B. whereas the institutions of the European Union are contributing to this debate by organising public discussion forums, including on-line forums, in their own working places, as well as at selected venues in the Member States, but the present Plan D has not yet reached a wider public in the Union,

Given the instrumental role of the eGovernment subgroup of leaders and representatives of the national eGovernment initiatives, their productive working methods and practical working relationship with EPAN, the Commission, after consultation of the Member States, will propose to continue the group at strategic level under the i2010 initiative.

Following the publication of the Commission staff working paper "Science, Society and the Citizen in Europe" in November 2000, a wide consultation on the relations between science and society was launched through an on-line forum[21].

The related online questionnaire, posted on Internet between March and May 2001, resulted in over 200 responses.

However, analysis of the progress made in the light of the 4 common objectives reveals that: (a) the measures concerned with promoting access to the labour market have, in tandem with the NAP/empl, achieved considerable success; (b) pursuit of the reform of the social protection system has not affected attainment of the goals inherent in the Minimum Guaranteed Income scheme (scheme combining financial benefits with a socio-occupational integration plan); (c) the aim of having all persons in a situation of exclusion sign a "social integration contract" within one year was too ambitious and was difficult both to implement and to evaluate ...[+++], since it requires multisectoral involvement and since the universe of individuals to be covered remains undefined (the same comment applies to the individualised follow-up of children and young persons within three months); (d) the setting up of a national social welfare helpline has made it easier for certain priority groups to obtain information and a rapid response to their problems; (e) the "Urban Social Development Contracts" and the "Rural Areas and Social Development" project, which were aimed at tackling the problems of the regional nature of exclusion, were abandoned for budgetary and policy reasons; (f) as regards mobilising stakeholders in the process, the Interministerial Monitoring Committee, set up expressly to monitor the NAPincl, operated only intermittently and its composition had to be altered following the change of government, hence its impact as an institutional co-ordination forum has been established only gradually; as regards civil society, the vague reference to the Co-operation and Social Solidarity Pact and the project for the creation of an NGOs Forum illustrates the low degree of involvement of these players.