Traduction de «Groupe Analyse de la demande de trafic » (Français → Anglais) :

Air Traffic Demand Analysis Group | ADAG [Abbr.]

Air Traffic Demand Analysis Group | ADAG [Abbr.]

Air Traffic Demand Analysis Group

8. Encourages the countries of the region, the Arab League and the African Union to support the continuation of constructive engagement between the parties with a view to reaching a solution; encourages, in particular, states in the Sahel, Maghreb and Mashreq regions to coordinate their efforts to prevent terrorist groups from crossing borders and seeking safe havens in the Sahel region; calls on these states to enhance cooperation and coordination in order to develop inclusive and effective strategies to prevent the expansion of those groups and to prevent the proliferation of all arms and transnational organised crime, inclu ...[+++]ding drug trafficking, in the region; endorses, in this connection, the Algerian Government’s call for further cooperation on these issues among countries in the region;

22. Notes with concern the enormous disparities in translation costs among the various Union institutions; calls, therefore, on the Interinstitutional Working Party on Translation to identify the causes of those disparities and put forward solutions that will put an end to the imbalance and harmonise translation costs while ensuring full respect for quality and linguistic diversity; notes with this in mind that the working party should re-launch cooperation among the institutions in order to share best practices and outcomes and to identify areas in which cooperation or agreements between institutions can be strengthened; notes that the working party should also aim to establish a unified methodology for the presentation of translation c ...[+++]osts which all the institutions can use in order to make it simpler to analyse and compare costs; notes that the working party should present those findings before the end of 2015; calls on all the Union institutions to play an active role in the work of the Interinstitutional Working Party; recalls in this regard the fundamental importance of respect for multilingualism in the Union institutions in order to guarantee equal treatment and equal opportunities for all Union citizens;

12. Notes with concern that translation costs vary enormously from one Union institution to another; asks consequently that the Interinstitutional Working Group on Translation determine the causes of these disparities and put forward solutions with a view to ending the inequality and harmonising translation costs, without in any way impairing quality and linguistic diversity; notes, with this in mind, that the working group should relaunch interinstitutional collaboration in order to share best practices and outcomes and determine those areas in which interinstitutional cooperation or agreements could be strengthened; notes that the w ...[+++]orking group should also aim to establish a unified methodology, common to all the institutions, for the presentation of translation costs in order to simplify cost analysis and comparison; notes that the working group should present the results of this work before the end of 2015; calls on all the institutions to play an active part in the proceedings of the Interinstitutional Working Group; points to the fundamental importance of preserving multilingualism in the Union institutions in order to ensure that all Union citizens can enjoy equal treatment and equal opportunities;

21. Proposes that the Commission establish this group as a high-level Better Regulation Advisory Body involving both stakeholder expertise and national experts as soon as possible; proposes a strong and independent advisory mandate for this body, which should complement the Commission’s work on IAs; believes that such a body’s expertise, including as regards subsidiarity and proportionality, could provide added value for the IA procedure and for other initiatives relating to better regulation; asks that Parliament and the Council be involved in the expert nomination procedure; suggests that the best practices and experience of existi ...[+++]ng better regulation bodies (such as those in Sweden, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany) be taken into account;