Traduction de «Indicateur de fin de segment de données » (Français → Anglais) :

4. Considers it necessary to establish clear definitions regarding the statistical indicators used for the collection of workforce employment data in fisheries, aquaculture and related sectors; also considers it necessary to draw up a harmonised set of statistical indicators at EU level, and calls on the Member States to provide, in due time, full data in accordance with those indicators;

5. Calls on the Member States to increase their efforts to prevent segregation of job markets by including in their structural labour market reforms instruments such as the European Social Fund (ESF) to combat professional segregation of women, as manifested both in the inadequate representation of women in leading positions and in the gender-segregated labour market, through effective measures against prejudices and stereotypes, as well as ‘glass ceiling’ barriers, exchange of good practice and benchmarking indicators between the Member States, and legislative measures including quotas to increase women’s representation in leading posit ...[+++]ions;

Furthermore, there are national database already working with comparisons on the basis of 10 loci (higher number than the ESS of loci) and as a rule they should be compelled to use all loci available since the accuracy of the match increases with the number of loci compared.

55. Believes that it is not at all self-evident how to measure the success of the Lisbon Strategy or, more generally speaking, which indicators would be appropriate ways to measure "progress"; takes the definite view, however, that monitoring successes and failures cannot be restricted to economic indicators such as GDP/GNI alone, since they are – at best – indicators of wealth creation over a given period, but do not even give reliable information about the level of wealth in a society, and far from give any hint of the social and e ...[+++]nvironmental costs at which such additional wealth creation comes;

56. Believes that it is not at all self-evident how to measure the success of the Lisbon agenda or, more generally speaking, which indicators would be appropriate ways to measure ‘progress’; takes the definite view, however, that monitoring successes and failures cannot be restricted to economic indicators such as GNI alone, since GNI is – at best – an indicator of wealth creation over a given period, but does not even give reliable information about the level of wealth in a society, and is far from giving any hint of the social and e ...[+++]nvironmental costs at which additional wealth creation comes;

This concerned essentially: (i) health indicators projects addressed to create a EU common list (ECHI) as well as to develop indicators in areas as diseases, health systems, pharmaceuticals, mental health, life styles, etc (ii) projects focusing on routine and sustainable data collection (e.g. Injury Database, Cancer databases), (iii) projects focusing on the improvement of mechanisms of health reporting (Health Interview Survey projects, Hospital Data projects), and (iv) projects addressed to improve or establish best clinical and codification practices.