Traduction de «Institut d'informatique du Canada » (Français → Anglais) :

91. Takes the view that the mass surveillance revelations that have initiated this crisis can be used as an opportunity for Europe to take the initiative and build up, as a strategic priority measure, a strong and autonomous IT key-resource capability; stresses that in order to regain trust, such a European IT capability should be based, as much as possible, on open standards and open-source software and if possible hardware, making the whole supply chain from processor design to application layer transparent and reviewable; points out that in order to regain competitiveness in the strategic sector of IT services, a ‘digital new deal’ ...[+++]is needed, with joint and large-scale efforts by EU institutions, Member States, research institutions, industry and civil society; calls on the Commission and the Member States to use public procurement as leverage to support such resource capability in the EU by making EU security and privacy standards a key requirement in the public procurement of IT goods and services; urges the Commission, therefore, to review the current public procurement practices with regard to data processing in order to consider restricting tender procedures to certified companies, and possibly to EU companies, where security or other vital interests are involved;

91. Takes the view that the mass surveillance revelations that have initiated this crisis can be used as an opportunity for Europe to take the initiative and build up, as a strategic priority measure, a strong and autonomous IT key-resource capability; stresses that in order to regain trust, such a European IT capability should be based, as much as possible, on open standards and open-source software and if possible hardware, making the whole supply chain from processor design to application layer transparent and reviewable; points out that in order to regain competitiveness in the strategic sector of IT services, a ‘digital new deal’ ...[+++]is needed, with joint and large-scale efforts by EU institutions, Member States, research institutions, industry and civil society; calls on the Commission and the Member States to use public procurement as leverage to support such resource capability in the EU by making EU security and privacy standards a key requirement in the public procurement of IT goods and services; urges the Commission, therefore, to review the current public procurement practices with regard to data processing in order to consider restricting tender procedures to certified companies, and possibly to EU companies, where security or other vital interests are involved;

30. Stresses that the use of cloud services by public authorities, including by law enforcement authorities and EU institutions, requires special consideration and coordination between the Member States; recalls that data integrity and security must be guaranteed and unauthorised access, including by foreign governments and their intelligence services without a legal basis under Union or Member State law, prevented; stresses that this also applies to the specific processing activities of certain essential non-governmental services, in particular the processing of specific categories of personal data, such as by banks, insurance compani ...[+++]es, pension funds, schools and hospitals; stresses, furthermore, that all of the aforementioned is of particular importance if data is being transferred (outside the European Union between different jurisdictions); takes the view, therefore, that public authorities, as well as non-governmental services and the private sector, should, as far as possible, rely on EU cloud providers when processing sensitive data and information until satisfactory global rules on data protection have been introduced, ensuring the security of sensitive data and of data bases held by public entities;

53. Believes strongly that the forthcoming proposals on a review of Directive 95/46/EC and of the Data Retention Directive should be ambitious, going beyond the insufficient protection offered by the Framework Decision on data protection in the former third pillar; stresses the importance of addressing key cyber security and privacy issues in relation to cloud computing and the ‘Internet of things’; stresses that data protection should be ambitious also in the context of fighting terrorism; calls on the Commission to respect EU data protection when negotiating with third countries, stressing that Parliament will carefully scrutinise all proposals, including EU-PNR and an EU system for extraction of financial data and any EU PNR agreement ...[+++]s with third countries (with negotiations currently under way with the US, Canada and Australia) for their compliance with fundamental rights;

47. Believes strongly that the forthcoming proposals on a review of Directive 95/46/EC and of the Data Retention Directive should be ambitious, going beyond the insufficient protection offered by the Framework Decision on data protection in the former third pillar; stresses the importance of addressing key cyber security and privacy issues in relation to cloud computing and the ‘Internet of things’; stresses that data protection should be ambitious also in the context of fighting terrorism; calls on the Commission to respect EU data protection when negotiating with third countries, stressing that Parliament will carefully scrutinise all proposals, including EU-PNR and an EU system for extraction of financial data and any EU PNR agreement ...[+++]s with third countries (with negotiations currently under way with the US, Canada and Australia) for their compliance with fundamental rights;

Key Action 6: Present in 2010 measures aiming at a reinforced and high level Network and Information Security Policy, including legislative initiatives such as a modernised ENISA, and measures allowing faster reactions in the event of cyber attacks, including a Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) for the EU institutions.