Traduction de «Milieu hostile au risque » (Français → Anglais) :

However, Member States should not be required to take specific steps where there is no significant risk to the marine environment, or where the costs would be disproportionate taking account of the risks to the marine environment, provided that any decision not to take action is properly justified.

4. Member States shall develop and implement all the elements of marine strategies referred to in Article 5(2), but shall not be required, except in respect of the initial assessment described in Article 8, to take specific steps where there is no significant risk to the marine environment, or where the costs would be disproportionate taking account of the risks to the marine environment, and provided that there is no further deterioration.

‘pollution’ means the direct or indirect introduction into the marine environment, as a result of human activity, of substances or energy, including human-induced marine underwater noise, which results or is likely to result in deleterious effects such as harm to living resources and marine ecosystems, including loss of biodiversity, hazards to human health, the hindering of marine activities, including fishing, tourism and recreation and other legitimate uses of the sea, impairment of the quality for use of sea water and reduction of amenities or, in general, impairment of the sustainable use of marine goods and services.

This instrument will be flexible enough to achieve our aims in a legally and politically hostile environment.

There is no alternative: if we live among friendly countries, we will succeed in resolving this tragic problem; if we do not live among friendly countries, they will continue, with a hostile approach, to send us emigrants, exploiting them, and we will no longer know what position to adopt or what decisions to take.

21. Opposes proposals to calculate a capital charge for other risks based on crude indicators such as size of firm, income, turnover, etc, as such measurements are inappropriate proxies which bear no obvious relationship with “other risks”; believes that a charge based on such proxies would penalise successful companies and encourage banks to manage the capital charge rather than manage risk; is particularly concerned at the impact of such a charge on high-volume, low-risk investment businesses such as index funds; believes that, in the event that a charge for other risks is introduced, transitional provisions should be devised to ens ...[+++]ure that banks which cannot immediately take advantage of the more risk sensitive internal ratings approach are not penalised with a heavy additional charge for “other risks”;