Traduction de «Obligation émise par des organismes fédéraux » (Français → Anglais) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 452 Mr. Matthew Kellway: With regard to suppliers of garments and textiles that are manufactured outside Canada, in whole or in part, and which have been contracted by any agency or department of the government: (a) what is the process by which Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) may ask suppliers for evidence of compliance with local labour laws; (b) on how many occasions has PWGSC asked suppliers for evidence of compliance with local labour laws; (c) if PWGSC has ever requested evidence of supplier compliance with local labour laws, (i) which office within PWGSC initiated these requests an ...[+++]d under whose authority, (ii) why were these requests initiated, (iii) when were these requests initiated, (iv) were these requests for evidence limited in scope to the production process under the direct purview of the supplier, or did they extend to all inputs in the production process even if these inputs were contracted out or otherwise not directly manufactured by the supplier, (v) what type of evidence did PWGSC ask suppliers to provide, (vi) did PWGSC request that suppliers provide evidence verified by independent auditors or inspectors, (vii) did PWGSC ever give individuals from the public, organizations, or governments an opportunity to provide evidence about supplier compliance with local labour laws and to whom were these opportunities extended; (d) if suppliers have ever responded to requests made by the PWGSC for evidence of compliance with local labour laws, (i) how did suppliers respond to these requests, (ii) what information did suppliers provide as evidence, (iii) where and at which office are records of these responses kept, (iv) what method was used by PWGSC to ensure that evidence provided by these suppliers was accurate, (v) did PWGSC ever rely on the services of independent auditors or inspectors to verify the evidence provided by suppliers; (e) what is PWGSC’s policy toward suppliers that are not operating i ...

Even in the most integrated form as envisaged in part 3, Eurobonds would remain different from those issued by federal states because they would finance, in an aggregated way, the debt of the Member States and not that of the Euro zone.

"[...] The 10% limit for senior units issued by French Fonds Communs de Créances or by equivalent securitisation entities as specified in points (d) and (e) does not apply, provided that: (i) the securitised residential or commercial real estate exposures were originated by a member of the same consolidated group of which the issuer of the covered bonds is also a member or by an entity affiliated to the same central body to which the issuer of the covered bonds is also affiliated (that common group membership or affiliation to be determined at ...[+++] the time the senior units are made collateral for covered bonds; and (ii) a member of the same consolidated group of which the issuer of the covered bonds is also a member or an entity affiliated to the same central body to which the issuer of the covered bonds is also affiliated retains the whole first loss tranche supporting those senior units".

Whereas it is desirable to permit a UCITS to invest its assets in units of other collective investment undertakings of the open-ended type which also invest in transferable securities and which operate on the principle of risk-spreading; whereas the requirement of risk spreading for UCITS investing in other collective investment undertakings is indirectly respected since such UCITS can only invest in units issued by collective investment undertakings complying with the risk spreading criteria of Directive 85/611/EEC ; whereas it is important that such UCITS adequately disclose to investors the fact that they invest in units of other co ...[+++]llective investment undertakings;

This country's first environmental assessment law was introduced and, by cabinet order, all federal departments and agencies were directed to do environmental assessments on every federal program and policy submitted to cabinet.

It would permit all federal agencies to improve the level of awareness of their obligations under Part VII. Furthermore, this would highlight each of the federal agency's annual activities that support the vitality of official language minority communities within their specific mandate.