Traduction de «Prévoyance en cas de catastrophe » (Français → Anglais) :

Resilience building and disaster risk management in vulnerable, fragile or disaster affected countries and forgotten crises, including capacity building by EU Aid Volunteers and actions in the following stages of the disaster management cycle: disaster prevention, preparedness, disaster risk reduction and recovery from natural and man-made disasters: 31 % +/- 10 percentage points,

—Resilience building and disaster risk management in vulnerable, fragile or disaster affected countries and forgotten crises, including capacity building by EU Aid Volunteers and actions in the following stages of the disaster management cycle: disaster prevention, preparedness, disaster risk reduction and recovery from natural and man-made disasters: 31 % +/- 10 percentage points,

Resilience building and disaster risk management in vulnerable, fragile or disaster affected countries and forgotten crises, including capacity building by EU Aid Volunteers and actions in the following stages of the disaster management cycle: disaster prevention, preparedness, disaster risk reduction and recovery from natural and man-made disasters: 31 % +/- 10 percentage points,

Calls for the urgent establishment of a European crisis-response mechanism, based in the Commission's services, which should coordinate civilian and military means so as to ensure that the EU has a rapid-response capability to deal with a CBRN disaster; and reiterates its call for the establishment of a European civil protection force based on the existing EU Civil Protection Mechanism, which will enable the Union to bring together the resources necessary for providing emergency assistance, including humanitarian aid, within 24 hours of a CBRN disaster inside or outside EU territory; stresses that suitable bridges and partnerships should also be built between bodies such as Eu ...[+++]ropol, Interpol and law-enforcement authorities in the Member States with a view to creating an appropriate and effective network for proactive anticipation/real-time monitoring of emergencies and operational engagement/coordination to deal with CBRN-related disasters, and stresses the need to report to the Commission as well; recalls the 2006 Barnier report entitled ‘For a European civil protection force: Europe aid’ (23) which Parliament strongly supported, and welcomes in that regard the new willingness by the Commission to create a European Emergency Response Capacity, as stated in the Commission Communication entitled ‘Towards a stronger European disaster response: the role of civil protection and humanitarian assistance’ (COM(2010)0600);

reaffirms, especially in the light of the disaster in Japan, the importance of an effective support system with short response times for the protection of the population, which can only be guaranteed at regional and local level; stresses the call set out in the resolution of the Committee of the Regions on: ‘The consequences of the natural disaster in Japan: lessons for the European Union’ (CdR 123/2011) for a debate on key security issues in the light of the findings from Japan and the need to take into account the latest research in the field; calls on the Member States and regions to examine their existing plans for disaster prevent ...[+++]ion on the basis of these findings and revise them where necessary;

This states that in the event that the Commission determines that an exceptional natural disaster had affected the Czech Republic, revised intervention rates could apply (increasing the ceiling on public aid from 50% to 75% of public aid as well as a higher rate of Community co-financing from 75% to 85%).