Traduction de «Rapport puissance du signal reçu » (Français → Anglais) :

Two of these Member States reported that they had neither refused nor granted a single request, two reported only one each, and only two had more than 100 requests.

46. Remains concerned by the suspiciously low fraud rates reported by France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom, especially considering their size and the amount of financial support received; regrets that in its annual report the Commission did not offer a definitive answer to the question of whether the low suspected fraud rates reported by France, Germany, Spain and the UK are the result of non-compliance with reporting principles or of the ability of the control systems put in place in these Member States to detect fraud; calls on the aforementioned Member States to provide detailed and thorough explanations of their low rates ...[+++]of reported suspected fraud as soon as possible;

46. Remains concerned by the suspiciously low fraud rates reported by France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom, especially considering their size and the amount of financial support received; regrets that in its annual report the Commission did not offer a definitive answer to the question of whether the low suspected fraud rates reported by France, Germany, Spain and the UK are the result of non-compliance with reporting principles or of the ability of the control systems put in place in these Member States to detect fraud; calls on the aforementioned Member States to provide detailed and thorough explanations of their low rates ...[+++]of reported suspected fraud as soon as possible;

I realise that it is hard to bring the positions from so many different political and national backgrounds into line, but the votes in committees involved show that the reports have been met with wide support. This sends a clear signal to the Commission on the follow-up to the Green Paper.

(Return tabled) Question No. 473 Hon. Ujjal Dosanjh: With regard to reports that Canadian soldiers witnessed Afghan children being sexually abused by members of the Afghan National Police or the Afghan National Army: (a) were any complaints or reports filed with either the Canadian Forces, Military Police, Department of National Defence, or Department of Foreign Affairs alleging that children were being abused; (b) when were these complaints or reports filed; (c) what actions were taken to address these complaints or reports; (d) w ...[+++]hen was the Minister of National Defence or his office informed of the existence of these complaints or reports; (e) what instructions were given by the Minister of National Defence or his office with regard to these complaints or reports, and when; (f) when did the Minister of National Defence first receive a briefing on this issue; (g) when were briefing notes first written by either the Minister’s staff, the Department of National Defence, the Department of Foreign Affairs, the Canadian Forces, or the Military Police; (h) were the Canadian Forces or Military Police ever instructed not to report incidents of child sexual abuse and, if so, when; (i) were the Canadian Forces or Military Police ever instructed not to intervene or prevent incidents of child sexual abuse if they witnessed them and, if so, when; and (j) when were the Canadian Forces and Military Police explicitly instructed to report or prevent such incidents?

In a second line of thinking, and it is somewhat ironic that I am the one to ask you a question on the fact that one senses very clearly in this report, based on the remarks that we have heard from private businesses, that the majority of private businesses say that EDC has an extraordinary reputation and an outstanding mandate, but that it prevents private businesses from acting in Canada as it does in other countries; that EDC, because of its power, the government protection that it enjoys, because of its lack of transparency, has a strategic advantage over all private lenders, whether it be in the banking field or that of internation ...[+++]al reinsurers.