Traduction de «Révisé en hausse » (Français → Anglais) :

11. Cannot always see a clear correlation between the Commission's political priorities, as described in its Annual Policy Strategy (APS) and the PDB, and increases in the corresponding budget lines and policy areas; is still not satisfied with the attempts of the Commission to include Parliament's priorities in the PDB; is not convinced, for example, that the climate change priority really is reflected throughout the budget as proposed by the Commission; wishes to receive more precise information as to the methodology used to come to the conclusion that over 10%, or EUR 14 billion, of the EU budget is spent on environmental targets; ...[+++] requests a comprehensive presentation of all climate change related expenditure in the budget, including rural development and structural funds, to be able to evaluate the correlation between political and budgetary priorities; points to the need to revise current programmes at the mid term review in order to better integrate climate change objectives and provide for improved policy coherence;

11. Cannot always see a clear correlation between the Commission's political priorities, as described in its Annual Policy Strategy (APS) and the PDB, and increases in the corresponding budget lines and policy areas; is still not satisfied with the attempts of the Commission to include Parliament's priorities in the PDB; is not convinced, for example, that the climate change priority really is reflected throughout the budget as proposed by the Commission; wishes to receive more precise information as to the methodology used to come to the conclusion that over 10%, or EUR 14 billion, of the EU budget is spent on environmental targets; ...[+++] requests a comprehensive presentation of all climate change related expenditure in the budget, including rural development and structural funds, to be able to evaluate the correlation between political and budgetary priorities; points to the need to revise current programmes at the mid term review in order to better integrate climate change objectives and provide for improved policy coherence;

9. Cannot always see a clear correlation between the Commission's political priorities, as described in its Annual Policy Strategy (APS) and the PDB, and increases in the corresponding budget lines and policy areas; is still not satisfied with the attempts of the Commission to include Parliament's priorities in the PDB; is not convinced, for example, that the climate change priority really is reflected throughout the budget as proposed by the Commission; wishes to receive more information as to the methodology used to come to the conclusion that over 10%, or EUR 14 billion, of the EU budget is spent on environmental targets; requests ...[+++] a comprehensive presentation of all climate change related expenditure in the budget, including the structural funds, to be able to evaluate the correlation between political and budgetary priorities;

While this Directive should not increase the hourly amount of admissible advertising, it should give flexibility to broadcasters with regard to its insertion where this does not unduly impair the integrity of programmes.

E. whereas oil price increases and volatility dampen macroeconomic growth by raising inflation and unemployment and by depressing the value of financial and other assets; whereas the ECB has, accordingly, reviewed its growth forecasts slightly downwards (between 1 and 1.6% of GDP for 2005 and between 1.3 and 2.3% for 2006); whereas the ECB also predicts an upward revision of inflation forecasts in the euro zone for the year to come as a consequence of changes in oil prices (between 2.1% and 2.3% in 2005 and between 1.4% and 2.4% in 2006),

The current Multiannuel Guidance Programme (MAGP) provisions allow for an increase in the objectives for reasons of safety provided that it does not result in an increase in fishing effort.