Traduction de «Transposition en fréquence » (Français → Anglais) :

14. Advocates the drafting of rules empowering the Commission to require Member States to release the frequencies needed for the pan-European services and applications decided by the Council and Parliament; on each occasion, before the Council and Parliament take their decisions on these services and applications, the SPEG should, by way of conclusion, ascertain how many frequencies are needed in what band; rules should also be drafted to ensure that decisions adopted in the CEPT are transposed in the Member States in accordance with the rules applicable to transposition of Commun ...[+++]ity directives;

Although, in fact, this regime was replaced by a declaration procedure with the "Conseil Supérieur de l'Audiovisuel" (the "C.S.A". ) further to recent Court of Justice case law, the relevant legal provisions have still not been formally repealed; 2. Article 4 of decree n°92-882 of 1/9/1992 remains in force. This includes an ambiguous definition of the criteria used by France to establish jurisdiction over cable services, as well as an "anti-delocalisation" clause drafted in an inappropriate way. These provisions are contrary to Article 2(1) and (2) of the Directive; 3. Inadequate transposition ...[+++] of Article 22 of the Directive, which relates to the protection of minors; 4. Establishment of special rules for the broadcast by satellite of television services in a foreign language, which is contrary to Article 2(1) of the Directive. 5. Lack of a decree establishing the legal framework for services broadcast by satellite using a frequency not managed by the C.S.A., which is contrary to Articles 2(1) and 3(2) of the Directive.

It covers the 1989 bathing season plus the 1990 figures for Belgium, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, the only Member States to send these details by 15 February 1991. Portugal is exempt from the Directive until 1992, but nevertheless submitted a report for 1990. A new format for submission of the data coupled with computerized mapping and?harmonized wording speeded up publication of the report. From now on, each year a report will be published on the previous bathing season. It must be added that the national measures taken to implement Directive 76/160/EEC have given birth to diverging standards which often m ...[+++]ake it difficult, if not impossible, to compare water quality in different Member States. Since December 1985, ten years after notification of the Directive, all bathing water is required to comply with the values laid down. However, not all bathing areas in the Community are yet up to these standards. A number of infringement procedures have been brought against such cases. Similar procedures have been initiated to solve other shortcomings, such as failure to measure specific parameters, inadequate sampling frequency, etc. Nevertheless, the results show a constant improvement in bathing water quality, as the Member States have made greater efforts to treat their effluent.