Traduction de «attaquer une décision » (Français → Anglais) :

to challenge a decision

challenge a negative decision

to contest the decision of a department

Definition: The essential feature is recurrent attacks of severe anxiety (panic), which are not restricted to any particular situation or set of circumstances and are therefore unpredictable. As with other anxiety disorders, the dominant symptoms include sudden onset of palpitations, chest pain, choking sensations, dizziness, and feelings of unreality (depersonalization or derealization). There is often also a secondary fear of dying, losing control, or going mad. Panic disorder should not be given as the main diagnosis if the patient has a depressive disorder at the time the attacks start; in these circumstances the panic attacks are probably sec ...[+++]ondary to depression. | Panic:attack | state

saturation attack | saturation computer attack | denial of service attack | DOSA | distributed denial of service | DDOS | distributed denial-of-service attack

attacking player [ attacker | striker | attack | forward ]

Definition: Fear of scrutiny by other people leading to avoidance of social situations. More pervasive social phobias are usually associated with low self-esteem and fear of criticism. They may present as a complaint of blushing, hand tremor, nausea, or urgency of micturition, the patient sometimes being convinced that one of these secondary manifestations of their anxiety is the primary problem. Symptoms may progress to panic attacks. | Anthropophobia Social neurosis

Definition: Hypersomnia is defined as a condition of either excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep attacks (not accounted for by an inadequate amount of sleep) or prolonged transition to the fully aroused state upon awakening. In the absence of an organic factor for the occurrence of hypersomnia, this condition is usually associated with mental disorders.

All but one of the companies (Qantas) subject to the 2010 decision challenged the decision before the EU's General Court.

In view of the fact that, as recognised in the judgment under appeal, the decision adopted by the Commission on 8 October 2010 does not contain any express reason for the requirement for the bank issuing the guarantee to have a credit rating, the judgment under appeal was incorrect in so far as it found that the contested measure was not vitiated by an inadequate statement of reasons, as claimed by the appellants in the proceedings before the General Court.

The purpose of communicating the freezing order is, inter alia, to allow the affected person to challenge the order.

The purpose of communicating the freezing order is, inter alia, to allow the affected person to challenge the order.