Traduction de «contrôle aléatoire » (Français → Anglais) :

CATSA is responsible for the pre-board screening of passengers and the belongings in their possession; checked baggage screening through the use of explosives detections systems; the random screening of non-passengers; and, the enabling of the biometric identification of non-passengers entering airport restricted areas.

For the purposes of this Directive, questioning does not include preliminary questioning by the police or by another law enforcement authority the purpose of which is to identify the person concerned, to verify the possession of weapons or other similar safety issues or to determine whether an investigation should be started, for example in the course of a road-side check, or during regular random checks when a suspect or accused person has not yet been identified.

Third, with regard to non-passenger screening in restricted areas of airports, CATSA conducts random screening in 29 Class I and II airports in Canada of all persons with access to restricted areas under the authorization of Transport Canada and its security screening.

However, what it then leads me to ask is, if we can do a background check—if Transport Canada can do it, or whoever—go through the RCMP, and issue a card with biometrics, or whatever, and we're satisfied that person is now an extremely low risk, to be going through with only random checks, why in God's name can't we do the same thing for travellers prepared to go through the same background checks, prepared to pay the cost associated with it, and thus reduce the workload for CATSA so they can focus their risk management on the higher-risk areas?

in the pursuit of its mission to ‘ensure the safety of the food chain and the quality of foods with a view to protecting human, animal and plant health’, the AFSCA is acting not as a private operator but as a public authority and that, consequently, it is not in receipt of State aid; there is no economic bias in favour of economic operators covered by Agency activities financed by fees and that, consequently, they are not in receipt of aid; as regards the financing of general random checks by fixed contributions, the operators receive no specific economic advantage and, consequently, no aid, given the compulsory nature of the checks and the fact that they cannot be invoiced directly to an individual company as they aim to ensure that the ...[+++]entire food chain is monitored (they benefit all operators and aim to protect health and food safety in Belgium); using contributions to finance part of the cost of BSE tests and other checks linked directly to the production and placing on the market of certain products is a form of State aid which complies with the Guidelines on State aids linked to BSE tests; the actual financing mechanism contains no specific provisions which would be contrary to other provisions of the Treaty, and the parameters for distributing the sum of contributions among operators in the various sectors are objective and fair criteria which do not lead to discriminatory treatment as regards the origin of the products.

The fact that Transport Canada conducts regular ongoing and random audits on screening staff is an important factor in maintaining our vigilance.