Translation of "document de priorité " (French → English) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 293 Hon. Lawrence MacAulay: With regard to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans’ (DFO) budget for Small Craft Harbours (SCH): (a) what was the total budget for SCH for each of the years from 1988 to present and what were the regional budgets for SCH in each of the years from 1988 to present; (b) what is the current projected budget for SCH for 2012; (c) are any of the SCH budget funds allocated for the regions being held back in a reserve; (d) what, if any, harbours are currently identified as “national priorities”; (e) are there any harbours which are slated to become “national priorities” in the next ...[+++]five years; (f) how much money has been spent to date on the Pangnirtung, Nunavut wharf and from what budget; (g) how much remains to be spent on the Pangnirtung wharf in the future; (h) is the money being spent on Pangnirtung affecting the money available for regional budgets for SCH; (i) what is the total breakdown of all money spent on any and all “national priority” harbours to date; (j) what is the complete breakdown of money spent to date from the $71.6 million in storm damage funding for Small Craft Harbours announced in March 2011; and (k) if the full amount of $71.6 million in storm damage funding has not yet been spent, does the government intend to spend that money and when and where will it be spent?

- an assessment of the relevance, complementarity, effectiveness, efficiency, added-value and impact of Cedefop’s activities and organisation in achieving the key objectives, priorities and tasks defined in its guiding policy documents for 2001-2006, such as the medium-term priorities and annual work programmes etc);

Our second base document is the international trade component of our department's report on planning and priorities, tabled in the House on September 26, 2006.

- to initiate preliminary actions, when and if necessary, in countries and regions for which migration and/or asylum are becoming priority issues but no Strategy Paper or Indicative Programme exists or the latter does not foresee the possibility of interventions in that field because migration and/or asylum were not priorities at the time the Indicative Programme was approved;

The priorities for human resources development derive from the priorities and conclusions pervading the Joint Assessment Papers (JAPs) agreed jointly by the Commission and each candidate country [25].

The working document The working document attached to the communication has three objectives: - to restate the Commission's determination to complete its work on the basis of the 1985 White Paper and, in this context, to achieve what is now the central political priority, i.e. the abolition of personal identity checks at the Community's internal frontiers; - to reaffirm the Commission's desire to develop the means to manage the single market effectively; - to identify the priorities for action that will push European integration for ...[+++]ward.