Traduction de «examen de mi-année » (Français → Anglais) :

mid-year review

Mid-term review of the implementation of the United Nations New Agenda for the Development of Africa in the 1990s

Ad Hoc Committee of the Whole of the General Assembly for the Mid-term Review of the Implementation of the United Nations New Agenda for the Development of Africa in the 1990s

mid-term review [ midterm review ]

midterm review

Mid-Term Global Review of the Programme of Action for the Least Developed Countries for the 1990s

man-year | person-year | staff-year

admission to examinations [ conditions of admission to examinations ]

public awareness campaign [ information campaign | international day | international year | public information campaign | world day | world year ]

The report contains two parts, i.e., a summary of findings and actions to be taken and annexed the 5 Years review with detailed information on issues regarding the application of the EIA Directive prepared on the basis of answers by information provided by the Member States.

Monitoring systems need to deliver timely information to support an informed assessment of programme performance at each annual review between programme managers and the Commission.

In parallel, two public consultations were organised: a first at the end of 2011 focused on review of the strengths and weaknesses of the existing air quality policy framework; the second on-line public consultation of all stakeholders on the main policy options available to address the remaining air quality problems in early 2013.[7] A Eurobarometer survey seeking the view of the general public on air pollution issues was conducted and reported in 2012.[8] The Commission and the European Environment Agency (EEA) also conducted an Air Implementation Pilot project, bringing together 12 cities from across the Union to assess local experie ...[+++]nce with implementing the air policy framework.[9]

5. Deplores the lack of, or unevenness in, the implementation in the Member States of guidelines agreed at the EU level, bearing in mind the necessary margin of discretion which the Member States enjoy to pursue their own policies, which prevents the agreed guidelines from unleashing their full potential to achieve EU 2020 goals; welcomes the fact of this year's Annual Growth Survey's emphasis being put on the need for implementation as well as on growth-enhancing actions; underlines the fact that the democratic legitimacy and national ownership of the changes which have been decided in terms of future economic governance need to be su ...[+++]bstantially increased;