Traduction de «examen des tâches » (Français → Anglais) :

Question No. 975 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to government legislation introduced in the 40th and 41st Parliaments in either the House or the Senate and the Department of Justice Act requirement in s. 4.1 that government legislation comply with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: (a) on what date was the legislation submitted for review; (b) which individuals conducted the review; (c) what are the job titles of the persons who performed the review; (d) what are the qualifications of the persons who performed the review; (e) is membership in good standing of a law society a requirement for performing the review; (f) were all those ...[+++] who participated in the review members in good standing of a law society at the time and, if so, which law societies were represented and how many years of practice did each individual involved have; (g) on what dates was the review conducted; (h) what is the process for such a review; (i) what doctrinal and jurisprudential sources were used to conduct the reviews, specifying (i) Canadian doctrinal sources, (ii) international doctrinal sources, (iii) domestic jurisprudential decisions, (iv) international jurisprudential decisions, (v) other legal or academic sources consulted; (j) what databases are accessed to conduct the review; (k) does any external consultation occur for the purposes of conducting such a review and, if so, what kinds of individuals or groups can be consulted; (l) how many drafts exist for each review report; (m) when were the memos in this regard presented to the Minister of Justice or any other member of the cabinet; (n) what was the cost of preparing each of these reports; (o) what is the budget allotted for the preparation of each report; (p) for each year since 2006, how much money has been allotted for undertaking each review; (q) for each year since 2006, how much money has been used to conduct each review; (r) how will the positions involved in the review process be affected by budget cuts at ...

By way of derogation from Article 5(6)(a)(i) to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 and Chapter III(A)(a) of Section III of Annex I to that Regulation, slaughterhouse staff authorised by the competent authority to carry out specific tasks of official auxiliaries shall be trained in the same way as official auxiliaries only with regard to the specific tasks they are authorised to perform and shall not be required to have passed the same examination as official auxiliaries.

However, when official auxiliaries carry out only sampling and analysis in connection with examinations for trichinosis, the competent authority need only ensure that they receive training appropriate to these tasks.

Following a comprehensive review carried out by its 'Peer Group', the Commission today adopted a two-year strategy to close the gap between its key tasks and the resources needed to perform them to the required standards of excellence.

33. to undertake a review of the present structures and instruments, including the resources, with the aim of organising more efficiently the work assigned to the Community with regard to the evaluation of substances, and to ensure that the high quality of the work carried out by the European Chemicals Bureau (ECB) in performing its assigned tasks will be maintained and reinforced;

MISCELLANEOUS DECISIONS (Adopted without debate) Development and implementation of the European Environment Agency - Council Conclusions "THE COUNCIL HAVING NOTED that Council Regulation (EEC) No 1210/90 of 7 May 1990 [6] makes provision in its Article 20 for a decision on further tasks for the Agency, based on a Report from the Commission, no later than two years after the entry into force of the Regulation; that, in accordance with Article 21, the Regulation came into force on 30 October 1993, the day following the decision of the competent authorities to locate the seat of the Agency in Copenhagen; HAVING FURTHER NOTED that the Agen ...[+++]cy started to operate only in mid-1994 with its full staff not in post until the end of 1995 and that it would be desirable to allow the Agency at least two fully operational years before a decision is made on the assignment of further tasks to it; RECALLING that Articles 2 and 4 of the Regulation provide for the building of a network of organizations in its member countries which can contribute to the completion of the tasks of the Agency; FURTHER RECALLING that Article 19 of the Regulation opens the Agency to countries which are not members of the European Communities which conclude an agreement with the Community following the procedure in Article 228 of the Treaty, 1. WELCOMES AND SUPPORTS the communication from the Commission on the Review of the development and implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1210/90 on the establishment of the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European Environment Information and Observation Network (EIONET).