Traduction de «exposition en ligne » (Français → Anglais) :

Hedy Fry-moved, That Bill C-53, in Clause 7, be amended by (a) replacing lines 15 and 16 on page 11 with the following: (b) in relation to health risks, if a decision referred to in paragraph 28(1)(a) or (b) is being made or has been made in relation to a pest control product, (i) among other relevant factors, consider available information on aggregate exposure to the pest control product, namely dietary exposure and exposure from ...[+++] other non-occupational sources, including drinking water and use in and around homes and schools, and cumulative effects of the pest control product and other pest control products that have a common mechanism of toxicity, (ii) apply appropriate margins of safety to (b) replacing line 24 on page 11 with the following: (iii) in the case of a threshold effect, if the (c) replacing line 29 on page 11 with the following: applicable under subparagraph (ii) in After debate, the question being put on the amendment, it was, by a show of hands, adopted:

Question No. 55 Mr. Francis Scarpaleggia: With regard to Health Canada’s Radiofrequency Exposure Guidelines known as Safety Code 6: (a) how was the code established; (b) does the code deal with potential dangers from all electromagnetic devices; (c) what is the distinction between thermal and non-thermal effects of exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy; (d) does existing research on the thermal effects of exposure to RF energy adequately determine whether such exposure is safe for humans; (e) does existing research on the non-thermal effects of exposure to RF energy adequately determine whether such exposure is safe for humans; (f) what work is Health Canada undertaking to ...[+++] remedy the uncertainty surrounding the non-thermal effects of exposure to RF energy by carrying out additional research into the non-thermal effects of exposure to RF energy; and (g) are changes to the code planned to include the most up-to-date scientific research on devices such as Hydro “smart” meters?

This includes any exposures to the central, regional and local administration, public sector entities or any exposure guaranteed by any referred entity.

This also includes indirect exposures to any of the referred entities obtained, inter alia, through exposure to indices, funds or special purpose vehicles.

on the other hand, promotion operations, defined as the dissemination to the general public of scientific knowledge, the organisation of trade fairs or exhibitions, and participation in these and similar public relations exercises, including surveys and market research, are not considered as advertising; wherever expenses are listed as eligible for public support elsewhere in these guidelines, and notably in sub-chapter IV K, the provisions of the relevant sub-chapter shall apply; in this context, the activities concerning the organ ...[+++]isation of and the participation in forums to share knowledge between businesses, competitors, exhibitions and fairs and the vulgarisation of scientific knowledge and factual information on quality systems are not considered advertising but technical support;

Ms. Hedy Fry: Madam Chair, in L-4 it's pretty self-evident that what we're doing is replacing lines 15 and 16 on page 11 with the following: “(b) in relation to health risks, if a decision referred to in paragraph 28 (1)(a) or (b) is being made or has been made in relation to a pest control product,”. Then we're adding a small (i), which says: “among other relevant factors, consider available information on aggregate exposure to the pest control ...[+++] product, namely dietary exposure and exposure from other non-occupational sources, including drinking water and use in and around homes and schools, and cumulative effects of the pest control product and other pest control products that have a common mechanism of toxicity”.