Traduction de «mesures avant lancement » (Français → Anglais) :

11. Stresses that the revised 2006 Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management must provide for more transparency in the CFSP budgetary procedure and properly address the information requirements of the budgetary authority in order for that authority to be fully and regularly informed on the background, context and financial implications of political decisions in this policy area; takes the view that the European Parliament should receive adequate information prior to the adoption of mandates and strategies in the CFSP sphere; welcomes the support expressed by the VP/HR for the proposal that all ...[+++]important CSDP missions should be identified in the budget; believes, in this regard, that full transparency and democratic scrutiny require separate budget lines for each and every mission; reiterates its position that, in order to enhance the democratic legitimacy of the CFSP, Parliament's competent bodies should be consulted prior to the launch of CSDP missions and should be able properly to monitor CSDP missions in particular; emphasises that in order to fulfil the criteria of credibility and self-definition in the Lisbon Treaty, adequate budgetary resources need to be allocated to CFSP objectives;

Several concrete steps have already been taken towards simplifying procedures both before and after the launch of FP7.

2. Each competent authority shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, at least one year before the launch of the invitation to tender procedure or one year before the direct award, the following information at least is published in the Official Journal of the European Union:

2004 Report of the Commissioner of Firearms, tabled in the House of Commons, July 20, 2005 Statistics Canada table 254-0002, September 9, 2005 Question No. 180 Mr. Loyola Hearn: SWith regard to the U.S. booster rocket that was launched over Newfoundland and Labrador in May of 2005: (a) when was the government notified that the rocket was to be launched; (b) what was the government’s initial reaction to the notification of the launching of this rocket; (c) was there a request made by the government that the rocket not be launched and, if so, was the request an official request and was it oral or written; (d) was a Canadian environmental assessment performed ...[+++] before the launch of this rocket; (e) has a Canadian environmental assessment been performed since the launch of the rocket; (f) are there plans to do an environmental assessment; (g) what chemicals, if any, were deposited into the ocean as a result of the launching of this rocket; (h) was a clean-up of any chemicals performed as a result of the launching of this rocket and, if so, by whom and at what cost; (i) does the government have any scientific reports of the effects of the booster rocket chemicals on marine life; (j) is the government aware if the U.S. intends to launch future rockets over similar areas of our coastline and, if so, when will these rockets be launched; (k) has the booster been retrieved from the ocean floor; and (l) are there plans to retrieve the booster from the ocean floor and, if so, when and at what cost?

7. Regrets the fact that little progress has been achieved in the area of interinstitutional cooperation in previous years and considers that the measures envisaged in the joint report of the Secretaries General on the evolution of heading 5 and on interinstitutional cooperation lack ambition; requests all the Secretaries-General to continue examining further possibilities for inter-institutional cooperation with a view to creating additional savings and to present a report with their conclusions by 30th April 2002; regrets that the Interinstitutional Recruitment Office will not be established at the beginning of 2002 as originally env ...[+++]isaged; insists that the Interinstitutional Recruitment Office should be fully operational by the end of 2002, so that recruitment procedures with a view to enlargement can be launched;

Furthermore, in view of its potential power to act autonomously as regards the introduction of emergency measures, not to mention the presumably lengthy period which will pass before it is possible to ascertain whether these measures are well-founded, even purely in terms of employment, it should be noted that there is no mention of the damage which would be caused to a company – to its employees in particular – by an erroneous decision.