Translation of "nom commercial " (French → English) :

21 (1) Where, in any proceedings respecting a registered trade-mark the registration of which is entitled to the protection of subsection 17(2), it is made to appear to the Federal Court that one of the parties to the proceedings, other than the registered owner of the trade-mark, had in good faith used a confusing trade-mark or trade-name in Canada before the date of filing of the application for that registration, and the Court considers that it is not contrary to the public interest that the continued use of the confusing trade-mark or trade-name should be permitted in a defined territorial area concurrently with the use of the registered trade-mark, the Court may, subject to such terms as it deems just, order that the other party may co ...[+++]ntinue to use the confusing trade-mark or trade-name within that area with an adequate specified distinction from the registered trade-mark.

(6) Where a television receiver is manufactured for sale under the trade name of a person who is not the manufacturer of the receiver, the trade name and the address of that person may, for the purposes of paragraph (4)(a), be substituted for the name and address of the manufacturer if the name and address of the manufacturer are permanently affixed to the inside of the cabinet or case of the receiver and are clearly visible under conditions of servicing.

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 52016AP0240 - EN - European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Additional Protocol to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (12594/2014 — C8-0180/2015 — 2014/0234(NLE)) // P8_TA(2016)0240 // EU-Colombia and Peru Trade Agreement (accession of Croatia) *** // European Parliament legislative re ...[+++]solution of 7 June 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Additional Protocol to the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (12594/2014 — C8-0180/2015 — 2014/0234(NLE)) // (Consent)

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 52016DC0058 - EN - REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Second Annual Report on the Implementation of the EU-Colombia/Peru Trade Agreement // COM(2016) 58 final

On 19 January 2009, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a multiparty trade agreement on behalf of the European Union and its Member States with the Member countries of the Andean Community which shared the aim of reaching an ambitious, comprehensive and balanced trade agreement.

Nevertheless, if such a programme funds itself entirely with a single class of commercial paper, and if either the programme-wide credit enhancement is not a re-securitisation or the commercial paper is fully supported by the sponsoring credit institution, leaving the commercial paper investor effectively exposed to the default risk of the sponsor instead of the underlying pools or assets, then that commercial paper generally should not be considered a re-securitisation exposure.