Translation of "ordre de mise en œuvre " (French → English) :

- In 2009, develop an Implementation Plan to clarify the key actions, responsibilities, main instruments and the sequencing of implementation for the priorities listed in para 5.1.

welcomes the fact that, on 20 May 2010, a special parliamentary committee was set up to amend and complete the legislative framework concerning the process to decentralise and strengthen local self-government, with the specific remit of furthering measures to implement the constitutional principles of local self-government and the decentralisation of public services, in strict compliance with the European Charter of Local Self-Government; supports this committee's aim of conducting a comprehensive assessment of the legal framework covering all aspects of activity by local and regional authorities, which will enable decentralisation to be fully implemented, including at sectoral level, in the fields of education, health, social protection, the environment ...[+++], law and order, etc.; expresses the hope that the reform measures to strengthen local self-government will be implemented in a timely fashion, so that all the implementation mechanisms can be operational by the time of the local general elections in the summer of 2011;

The EU will: ►Promote the inclusion of DRR on the agenda of high-level political meetings and make it part of regular political dialogue with developing countries ►Support the integration of DRR into developing countries' development policies and planning, including relevant sectoral policies, climate change adaptation strategies and cross-cutting issues ►Better integrate DRR into EU policies, support strategies, programmes and projects ►Support the development and implementation of national policy, legal and institutional frameworks for DRR, including National and Regional Platforms ►Ensure closer coordination of support for DRR in deve ...[+++]loping countries to help implement this strategy ►Support the UN/ISDR as the coordinating body for the implementation of the Hyogo Framework |

(Return tabled) Question No. 250 Mr. Thomas Mulcair: With respect to newly implemented tax credits: (a) what was the anticipated cost of the public transit tax credit measure prior to its implementation and how many Canadian transit users, by urban centre, were expected to file for this credit; (b) since its inception, on an annual basis, what has been the cost of implementing the public transit tax credit and how many Canadian transit users, by urban centre, have filed for this credit; (c) what would be the costs of extending the p ...[+++]ublic transit tax credit to users who pay for their transit on a basis other than with a monthly travel pass (i.e. on a daily or weekly basis, or by buying blocks of transit chits); (d) by what margin was transit ridership expected to increase with the implementation of this tax credit, by urban area and on an annual basis; (e) since the inception of this credit, how much has ridership increased or decreased, by urban area and on an annual basis; (f) what was the anticipated cost of the tax credit to promote physical fitness among children prior to its implementation; (g) how many Canadian families, by urban centre, were expected to file for this credit; (h) since its inception, on an annual basis, what has been the cost of implementing this tax credit; (i) how many Canadian families, by urban centre, have filed for this credit; (j) under existing regulations what length of time must a sports program be in operation for a family to be eligible for the tax credit; (k) what would be the costs of extending this credit to families who enroll children in sports programs whose duration is for two weeks or longer; and (l) since its implementation, what are the sports, by category that have most and least been utilized under this tax credit?

7. In accordance with Article 11(4) of this Regulation, each Member State may at any moment request to include on the agenda of the EDF Committee an exchange of views on implementation issues relating to a particular project or programme managed by the Commission.

In order to facilitate the implementation of the single payment scheme, it is appropriate to allow Member States to proceed already in the year preceding the first year of application of the scheme to the identification of the potential beneficiaries of the scheme in particular, in case of modifications in the holding due to inheritance or legal changes and to the provisional establishment of payment entitlements.