Translation of "région hors zone de pincement " (French → English) :

That said, and although not required to do so by the NLCA, the federal government and the NWMB have agreed that the Board is responsible for allocating Nunavut’s share of commercial fish quotas in Zone I, outside the NSA ([13]) This is significant because – as indicated above – both of Nunavut’s major commercial marine fisheries (turbot and shrimp) take place, for the most part, in Zone 1 ([14]) On the role of the NWMB, the Committee was informed that the Board: had not yet established a Total Allowable Harvest for any marine fish species (although commercial quotas were in place for some species within the NSA); ...[+++]holds a groundfish licence issued to Nunavut by the DFO in 2002; decides on how commercial quotas of turbot (and shrimp) outside the NSA are to be sub-allocated to Nunavut fishers (and then notifies the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans of its decisions); decided in 2002 that fish allocations would be made for a three-year period; and has produced a policy document outlining the criteria to be used when evaluating quota applications from territorial interests (see Appendix 1, NWMB Policy on Commercial Marine Fish Allocations Inside and Outside the NSA) ([15])

3. Member States may take the necessary measures to avoid premium rights being moved away from sensitive zones or regions where sheep production is especially important for the local economy.

(a) shall take the necessary measures to prevent premium rights being transferred outside sensitive areas or regions where beef and veal production is particularly important for the local economy.

Since Objective 5(b) now covers a larger area (more areas may now receive aid for rural development), the Commission considers that needs for assistance outside the Objective 1 and 5(b) areas are now decreasing, although they are increasing in the Objective 5(b) areas: 1992 1999 99/92 (%) Objective 5(a) excluding Objectives 1 and 5(b) 626 500 - 20.1 Objective 5(a) in Objective 5(b) areas 266 380 + 43.0 (c) Fisheries is included under Objective 5(a).

For 1986, the Commission introduced a new method of establishing regions with simple priority; concentration is achieved by means of a list taking account on the one hand of Community regions with the highest unemployment levels and the lowest per capita GDP, and on the other of areas undergoing industrial and sectoral rstructuring included in the ERDS and ECSC non-quota section.

For the 1986 financial year, the Commission has introduced a new method to determine the "absolute priority" regions, according to which concentration is achieved in accordance with a list containing on the one hand Community regions where the highest rates of unemployment are recorded and where the domestic product per inhabitant is lowest and on the other areas undergoing industrial and sectoral restructuring which are identified as non-quota ERDF and ECSC zones.