Traduction de «seuil de la déclaration » (Français → Anglais) :

adaptation of the thresholds for simplified reporting (Article 4).

15. Points out that, since 2006, Parliament has had to include expenditure not foreseen in its self-imposed 1988 declaration, such as the Statute for Members and direct and indirect expenditure related to its new role following the Lisbon Treaty; highlights the need for an open and in-depth discussion on the current, self-imposed 20% threshold, which applies to the level of the European Parliament budget; takes the view that the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets should work together to re-assess this limit before opening an interinstitutional dialogue on the issue; takes the view that, on the basis of the original MFF references neg ...[+++]otiated in 2006 and in force since 2007, its expenditure should be established around the traditional 20% limit, taking into account the needs of the other institutions and the available margin;

15. Points out that, since 2006, Parliament has had to include expenditure not foreseen in its self-imposed 1988 declaration, such as the Statute for Members and direct and indirect expenditure related to its new role following the Lisbon Treaty; highlights the need for an open and in-depth discussion on the current, self-imposed 20% threshold, which applies to the level of the European Parliament budget; takes the view that the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets should work together to re-assess this limit before opening an interinstitutional dialogue on the issue; takes the view that, on the basis of the original MFF references neg ...[+++]otiated in 2006 and in force since 2007, its expenditure should be established around the traditional 20% limit, taking into account the needs of the other institutions and the available margin;

The options related to BoP reporting are (4) maintain the existing threshold that exempts payment service providers from reporting on payment transactions below EUR 12 500; (5) create a voluntary Additional Optional Service (AOS) Community within SEPA that would allow the collection of statistical data from settlements to continue; (6) encourage voluntary adjustments by the Member States; and (7) address the BoP reporting problems through legislation, with three sub-options: (7a) raise the exemption threshold to EUR 50 000; (7b) abolish settlement-based BoP reporting obligations imposed on payment service providers; and (7c) raise t ...[+++]he exemption threshold to EUR 50 000 followed, in a second phase, by abolition of BoP reporting based on settlements by January 2012.

17. Welcomes the introduction of micro entities, which are to be exempt from the accounting, auditing and disclosure requirement under European law; urges that the threshold values referred to in the Communication for categorisation as a micro entity be broadly maintained but is concerned that meeting all of them may cause difficulties especially for businesses with high inputs; suggests that transition periods for companies' reporting requirements exceeding those thresholds be extended as appropriate; suggests that consideration be given to introducing similar transition periods for companies changing legal status;

Proponents of a declaration-based system argue that its effect as a deterrent should not be underestimated and that the resources required are very limited when compared with the results and benefits obtained, especially with a threshold for declaration as high as EUR 15 000.