Traduction de «technique de contrôle au cou » (Français → Anglais) :

3.3.1. For target sequence amplification assays, a functionality control for each test sample (internal control) shall reflect the state of the art. This control shall as far as possible be used throughout the whole process, i.e. extraction, amplification/hybridisation, detection.

Stresses the importance of developing new techniques in order to ensure a functioning control and surveillance system; calls on the Commission to continue to develop control techniques, and points in this connection to the possibility of electronic logbooks;

the official control methods and techniques used, such as, monitoring, surveillance, verification, audit, inspection, sampling and analysis, taking account of the requirements of Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004, and where and when such official control methods and techniques are used;

For road transport aim in particular at market access, road safety, road worthiness tests, road side inspections as well as social, fiscal and technical rules.

Administrative and management changes by Member States such as the development of risk analysis techniques to improve control efficiency; re-appraising their policies, structures and allocation of human and technical resources for controlling the application of VAT; and recognising the opportunities provided by new technologies for improving controls.

Conclusions At the end of this first evaluation and analysis exercise concerning resources for the monitoring of the fishing industry, the Commission takes the view that it must in future give priority to the following: - validation of the information transmitted by each Member State on resources devoted to control work and the outcome of this work; - new areas being covered by control work at Community level (in particular structural policy, market monitoring, possibility of checks during transport, and the development of systematic cross-checks between different sources of information); - the problems in each fishery that lie behind ...[+++]major infringements of Community regulations to the possible detriment of other Member States (e.g. quota overruns in the North and Baltic Seas and disregard of technical conservation rules in Region 3); - coordination between national administrations and between them and the Commission departments, particularly through accelerated implementation of new technology (satellite monitoring, computer links, etc.), plus coordination of action at sea (e.g. in the Atlantic tuna fisheries, checks on catches by vessels operating in the EEZ of one Member State and landing at a port in another,etc.) To sum up, the report stresses the role to be played by the Commission in the process of coordination in order to improve synergy and dispel suspicion between the various interests involved.