Translation of "tenue des documents " (French → English) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 611 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to the government’s plans for resource development, as described in the section entitled “Responsible Resource Development” in Chapter 3.2 of Budget 2012: (a) what are all examples of federal environmental laws that are stronger than provincial laws and how will the proposed legislative changes to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) affect the assessment of environmental impacts of industrial projects that cross provincial borders; (b) what research, action, or investment has the government undertaken to study impacts of the proposed legislative changes to the CEAA on (i) regulatory decision-making, (ii) risk of project-specific and cumulative environmental impac ...[+++]ts, (iii) risk mitigation by developers, (iv) Canada’s reputation; (c) what briefing notes, memos, or any other documentation, including, for each, the details of its findings and recommendations, have been provided to the Prime Minister, Minister of Natural Resources, Minister of the Environment, their respective Parliamentary Secretaries, their respective Deputy Ministers, and their respective staff members, regarding impacts of the proposed legislative changes to the CEAA on (i) regulatory decision-making, (ii) risk of project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts, (iii) mitigation by developers, (iv) Canada’s reputation; (d) will the proposed legislative changes to the CEAA give any consideration to (i) measuring negative impacts of development, (ii) managing negative impacts of development; (e) by what date will the government bring forth new “legislation to streamline the review process for major economic projects” (Budget 2012, p. 89); (f) what are the projected costs of changes to the CEAA for each province and territory; (g) what assessments of the adequacy of the environmental assessment process in each province and territory have been conducted, (i) what were the dates of any such assessments, (ii) what wer ...

In addition to the catch documents and any related documents validated in conformity with the CCSBT Catch Documentation scheme, the importer shall submit to the authorities of the Member States of importation the information on transport details, specified in the Appendix on transport details included in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.

20. In the light of the pros and cons of the standardized and the centralized approaches, the JTPF developed a new approach called "EU Transfer Pricing Documentation" (EU TPD) which combines aspects of the standardized approach and of the centralized (integrated global) documentation approach.

In response to public concerns about the effect of technological developments on personal privacy, the Department of Justice circulated a Consultation Paper in 2002, seeking public input into the question of whether new criminal offences were needed to deal with “voyeurism,” or the secret viewing or recording of citizens, “for sexual purposes or where the viewing or recording involves a serious breach of privacy” (3) The Consultation Paper noted that criminal prohibitions of that nature had been suggested in a motion passed at the Uni ...[+++]form Law Conference in August 2000, and by a resolution passed in February 2002 by Provincial and Territorial Ministers Responsible for Justice (4) In keeping with the recommendations of a majority of respondents to the Consultation Paper, Bill C-20 proposes the creation of two new hybrid offences of voyeurism, both of which incorporate a “public good” defence (5)

In response to public concerns about the effect of technological developments on personal privacy, the Department of Justice circulated a Consultation Paper in 2002, seeking public input into the question of whether new criminal offences were needed to deal with “voyeurism,” or the secret viewing or recording of citizens, “for sexual purposes or where the viewing or recording involves a serious breach of privacy” (4) The Consultation Paper noted that criminal prohibitions of that nature had been suggested in a motion passed at the Uni ...[+++]form Law Conference in August 2000, and by a resolution passed in February 2002 by Provincial and Territorial Ministers Responsible for Justice (5) In keeping with the recommendations of a majority of respondents to the Consultation Paper, Bill C-2 proposes the creation of two new hybrid offences of voyeurism, both of which incorporate a “public good” defence (6)

In response to public concerns about the effect of technological developments on personal privacy, the Department of Justice circulated a Consultation Paper in 2002, seeking public input into the question of whether new criminal offences were needed to deal with “voyeurism,” or the secret viewing or recording of citizens, “for sexual purposes or where the viewing or recording involves a serious breach of privacy” (4) The Consultation Paper noted that criminal prohibitions of that nature had been suggested in a motion passed at the Uni ...[+++]form Law Conference in August 2000, and by a resolution passed in February 2002 by Provincial and Territorial Ministers Responsible for Justice (5) In keeping with the recommendations of a majority of respondents to the Consultation Paper, Bill C-12 proposes the creation of two new hybrid offences of voyeurism, both of which incorporate a “public good” defence (6)