Translation of "Document processing " (English → French) :

E. whereas the European Semester has gained in importance and its process now incorporates multiple documents or subdocuments to be submitted by the Member States (National Reform Programmes (NRPs), Stability and Convergence Programmes (SCPs), National Social Reports (NSRs) and National Job Plans (NJPs)), and whereas these documents need to address increasing numbers of goals; whereas the number of such documents and the overlap between them detract from the transparency and coherence of the European Semester process; whereas the quality of the documents submitted by Member ...[+++] States and the level of involvement of stakeholders and national parliaments in their drafting varies greatly;

I. whereas the European Semester has gained in importance and its process now incorporates multiple documents or subdocuments to be submitted by the Member States (National Reform Programmes (NRPs), Stability and Convergence Programmes (SCPs), National Social Reports (NSRs) and National Job Plans (NJPs)), and whereas these documents need to address increasing numbers of goals; whereas the number of such documents and the overlap between them detract from the transparency and coherence of the European Semester process; whereas the quality of the documents submitted by Membe ...[+++]r States and the level of involvement of stakeholders and national parliaments in their drafting varies greatly;

J. whereas the European Semester has gained in importance and its process now incorporates multiple documents or subdocuments to be submitted by the Member States (National Reform Programmes (NRPs), Stability and Convergence Programmes (SCPs), National Social Reports (NSRs) and National Job Plans (NJPs)), and whereas these documents need to address increasing numbers of goals; whereas the number of such documents and the overlap between them detract from the transparency and coherence of the European Semester process; whereas the quality of the documents submitted by Membe ...[+++]r States and the level of involvement of stakeholders and national parliaments in their drafting varies greatly;

(Return tabled) Question No. 611 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to the government’s plans for resource development, as described in the section entitled “Responsible Resource Development” in Chapter 3.2 of Budget 2012: (a) what are all examples of federal environmental laws that are stronger than provincial laws and how will the proposed legislative changes to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) affect the assessment of environmental impacts of industrial projects that cross provincial borders; (b) what research, action, or investment has the government undertaken to study impacts of the proposed legislative changes to the CEAA on (i) regulatory decision-making, (ii) risk of project-specific and cumulative environmental impac ...[+++]ts, (iii) risk mitigation by developers, (iv) Canada’s reputation; (c) what briefing notes, memos, or any other documentation, including, for each, the details of its findings and recommendations, have been provided to the Prime Minister, Minister of Natural Resources, Minister of the Environment, their respective Parliamentary Secretaries, their respective Deputy Ministers, and their respective staff members, regarding impacts of the proposed legislative changes to the CEAA on (i) regulatory decision-making, (ii) risk of project-specific and cumulative environmental impacts, (iii) mitigation by developers, (iv) Canada’s reputation; (d) will the proposed legislative changes to the CEAA give any consideration to (i) measuring negative impacts of development, (ii) managing negative impacts of development; (e) by what date will the government bring forth new “legislation to streamline the review process for major economic projects” (Budget 2012, p. 89); (f) what are the projected costs of changes to the CEAA for each province and territory; (g) what assessments of the adequacy of the environmental assessment process in each province and territory have been conducted, (i) what were the dates of any such assessments, (ii) what wer ...

The aim of the first fundamental proposed change is to retain in its current form the valuable information exchange between interest groups, such as the industry and non-governmental organisations (‘Seville Process’), as part of the process of describing the best available techniques. The result of this process will still be the BAT reference document.

They are a simpler, more principled definition of regulation and other plain language improvements; an appropriate view of different classes of documents, including an expedited process for documents that do not require legal review; a revised exemption power that will now be subject to an express public interest consideration; a codification and clarification of the law by expressly authorizing the incorporation by reference of international and other standards into regulations, subject to an express accessibility requirement; a modernized process th ...[+++]at allows for the creation of an electronic registry of regulations; and finally, maintenance for government accountability for regulations through parliamentary scrutiny (2035) The new regulations act will relieve the system of documents that do not need to be subject to the regulatory process or at least to the whole process, either because they are not substantive or truly regulatory in the sense of establishing generally binding rules of conduct, or because their legality and accessibility are assured in some other way.