I'm not a physician, so it is best for me to leave the specifics of that to the physicians. But I do know, through my colleagues, that the information given by Dr. Gulenchyn , Dr. O'Brien, Dr. MacEwan, and some others we discussed it with was that essentially 10% of the nuclear medicine patient population would have been considered critical and in need of radioisotope imaging, around 40% to 50% would have been considered in need, and 40% could have been put off and done at a later date.
Ce que je sais, d'après ce que mes collègues Dr Gulenchyn, Dr O'Brien et Dr MacEwan et d'autres m'ont dit, on estimait à environ 10 p. 100 le taux de patients de la médecine nucléaire dont la condition était critique et qui avaient besoin de subir des scintigraphies, à 40 p. 100 à 50 p. 100 le taux de patients qui avaient besoin de soins et à 40 p. 100 le taux de ceux dont le traitement pouvait être remis à plus tard.
