Traduction de «Risk tolerance level » (Anglais → Français) :

tolerable level of deviation | tolerable deviation level | tolerable deviation rate | tolerable exception rate

discomfort level | discomfort threshold | uncomfortable loudness level | loudness discomfort level | tolerance threshold | tolerance level | threshold of discomfort

Review of National Ambient Air Quality Objectives for Sulphur Dioxides, Carbon Monoxide, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide - Maximum Tolerable Levels

risk tolerance | tolerance to risk

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

As the Court indicated in its comments on the Commission’s 2008 communication ‘Towards a common understanding of the concept of tolerable risk of error’ (COM(2008) 866), the concept of a tolerable level of error, or risk of error, raises issues which it is for Parliament and Council to debate and decide, both as legislator and in the context of the discharge procedure.

The Court sets out below observations relating to the purposes, definition, estimation and application of a tolerable level of risk, and to the responsibilities of institutions.

8. Welcomes the Commission communication of 16 December 2008 entitled 'Towards a common understanding of the concept of tolerable risk of error' (COM(2008)0866) and shares the view that a separate tolerable risk of error should be set for each policy area, taking due account of their respective characteristics and rules; endorses the 5% tolerable risk level for the structural funds, while recommending that a higher tolerable level be allowed for innovative projects – which, owing to their exp ...[+++]erimental nature, entail a greater risk of error – in order not to undermine their potential;

48. Welcomes the Commission communication of 16 December 2008 on a common understanding of the concept of tolerable risk of error as a sound methodological basis for an economic analysis of acceptable level of risk, and expects the Commission to take this work further when preparing its proposal on tolerable level of risk by budgetary area; recognises, in this context, the importance of that communication as an initial basis for discussion, from a strictly economic perspective, on 'tolerable ...[+++] level of risk' for two Union spending areas, i.e. the Structural Funds and the EAFRD; calls, however, for this dialogue between external auditor and audited party to continue to comply with international auditing standards which stipulate that it is for the external auditor to decide which risks he should take as the basis for his judgment as to the choice of audit procedure;