Translation of "asylum decision " (English → French) :

negative asylum decision | negative decision | decision to refuse asylum

positive asylum decision | positive decision

preparation of an asylum decision | preparation of a decision

political asylum [ diplomatic asylum | request for political asylum | territorial asylum(UNBIS) ]

acceptance rate of asylum applicants | acceptance rate of refugee claims | asylum application acceptance rate | asylum recognition rate | migrant acceptance rate | percentage of accepted asylum applications | proportion of asylum applications accepted | rate of recognition | recognition rate

application for asylum | asylum application | asylum claim | asylum request | claim for asylum

right of asylum [ territorial asylum(UNBIS) ]

lunatic asylum [ asylum for the insane | insane asylum ]

decision (EU) [ Commission Decision | Community decision | Council Decision | decision of the European Central Bank | decision of the European Council | decision of the European Parliament | European Council decision ]

The pieces of legislation concerned focus on fairer, quicker and better quality asylum decisions (the Asylum Procedures Directive); ensuring that there are humane physical reception conditions (such as housing) for asylum seekers across the EU (the Reception Conditions Directive); and clarifying the grounds for granting international protection (the Qualification Directive).

9. Calls for an urgent review of the Dublin Regulation by establishing a permanent EU-wide legally binding system of distribution of asylum seekers between the Member States, based on fair, compulsory allocation, while taking into account the needs and preferences of asylum seekers themselves; suggests that a system under which asylum seekers could apply for asylum in a Member State where they already have family ties, community links or better employment prospects would significantly improve their integration prospects; considers also that such a system would significantly reduce irregular secondary movements within the EU and the need for coercive measures such as the detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of transferring them back ...[+++] to the Member State responsible; calls on the Commission, furthermore, to put forward proposals to allow the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions, the transfer of international protection status within the EU and the creation of the Common European Asylum Service; urges the Member States, in the meantime, to apply the provisions in the Dublin Regulation without restrictive interpretation, in accordance with the principle of solidarity and fundamental rights, such as those relating to unaccompanied children, family reunification and discretionary clauses; welcomes the fact that Germany is applying the Dublin Regulation’s sovereignty clause to Syrian refugees so that they can stay in Germany instead of being sent back to the Member State of arrival; encourages other Member States to follow this example;

The Commission will launch a broad debate on the next steps in the development of the Common European Asylum System, including the possibilities of a common Asylum Code and the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions between Member States.

22. Takes note of the scheduled review of the functioning of the Dublin Regulation in 2016 and of the announcement of the Commissioner for Migration and Home Affairs that the Dublin system will be reviewed already this year; calls on the Commission to explore alternatives to the current Dublin system which would be fairer to both Member States and asylum seekers; suggests that a system under which asylum seekers could apply for asylum in a Member State where they already have family ties, community links or better employment prospects would significantly improve their integration prospects; in addition, such a system would significantly reduce irregular secondary movements within the EU, as well as the need for coercive measures such as ...[+++]detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of transferring them back to the Member State responsible; suggests further that a distribution key could be used to develop a fair allocation of funding among Member States and to allocate asylum seekers who have no strong reasons for preferring one or another Member State; furthermore, calls on the Commission to put forward proposals to allow the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions and the transfer of international protection status within the EU;