Traduction de «preparation an asylum decision » (Anglais → Français) :

preparation of an asylum decision | preparation of a decision

negative asylum decision | negative decision | decision to refuse asylum

positive asylum decision | positive decision

asylum decision

failed asylum seeker | person covered by a final decision rejecting an application for international protection | rejected applicant | rejected applicant for international protection

Guidelines for the calculation of financial consequences when preparing the Decision regarding the clearance of the accounts

Ad Hoc Working Group for the preparation of a draft Convention on Access to Environmental Information and Public Participation in environmental decision making

Working Group for the preparation of a draft convention on access to environmental information and public participation in environmental decision-making

National Defence Headquarters: Centre for Decision: A Study Prepared for the Commission of Inquiry into the Deployment of Canadian Forces to Somalia

The pieces of legislation concerned focus on fairer, quicker and better quality asylum decisions (the Asylum Procedures Directive); ensuring that there are humane physical reception conditions (such as housing) for asylum seekers across the EU (the Reception Conditions Directive); and clarifying the grounds for granting international protection (the Qualification Directive).

9. Calls for an urgent review of the Dublin Regulation by establishing a permanent EU-wide legally binding system of distribution of asylum seekers between the Member States, based on fair, compulsory allocation, while taking into account the needs and preferences of asylum seekers themselves; suggests that a system under which asylum seekers could apply for asylum in a Member State where they already have family ties, community links or better employment prospects would significantly improve their integration prospects; considers also that such a system would significantly reduce irregular secondary movements within the EU and the nee ...[+++]d for coercive measures such as the detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of transferring them back to the Member State responsible; calls on the Commission, furthermore, to put forward proposals to allow the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions, the transfer of international protection status within the EU and the creation of the Common European Asylum Service; urges the Member States, in the meantime, to apply the provisions in the Dublin Regulation without restrictive interpretation, in accordance with the principle of solidarity and fundamental rights, such as those relating to unaccompanied children, family reunification and discretionary clauses; welcomes the fact that Germany is applying the Dublin Regulation’s sovereignty clause to Syrian refugees so that they can stay in Germany instead of being sent back to the Member State of arrival; encourages other Member States to follow this example;

The Commission will launch a broad debate on the next steps in the development of the Common European Asylum System, including the possibilities of a common Asylum Code and the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions between Member States.

22. Takes note of the scheduled review of the functioning of the Dublin Regulation in 2016 and of the announcement of the Commissioner for Migration and Home Affairs that the Dublin system will be reviewed already this year; calls on the Commission to explore alternatives to the current Dublin system which would be fairer to both Member States and asylum seekers; suggests that a system under which asylum seekers could apply for asylum in a Member State where they already have family ties, community links or better employment prospec ...[+++]ts would significantly improve their integration prospects; in addition, such a system would significantly reduce irregular secondary movements within the EU, as well as the need for coercive measures such as detention of asylum seekers for the purpose of transferring them back to the Member State responsible; suggests further that a distribution key could be used to develop a fair allocation of funding among Member States and to allocate asylum seekers who have no strong reasons for preferring one or another Member State; furthermore, calls on the Commission to put forward proposals to allow the mutual recognition of positive asylum decisions and the transfer of international protection status within the EU;