Traduction de «op code register » (Anglais → Français) :

operation register [ operation code register | OP code register ]

condition code register

code register

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include sel ...[+++]f-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptoms, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

world register of owner codes

morphology code M905 with behaviour code /3

morphology codes M872-M879 with behaviour code /3

Dispatch of 19 December 2001 on the Revision of the Code of Obligations (Law on Limited Liability Companies and Amendments to the Law on Companies limited by Shares, Cooperatives, the Commercial Register and Business Names))

A first Transparency Register was established jointly by the European Parliament and the Commission in 2011; it was updated through an Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) agreed in April 2014 and currently applies only to the two institutions.The current voluntary Register includes over 9,800 entities bound by the Code of Conduct.

Most respondents considered that the EU institutions should lead by example in the area of transparency and in the framing of interactions of interest representatives with decision-makers; The need for the proposal to deliver a 'mandatory' system was stressed by many, although views diverged on how best to achieve this goal; The Register's broad definition of lobbying activities was deemed appropriate by most stakeholders; There was wide agreement on the necessity to improve the quality of data and the scope for simplification of some requirements on financial data; The Code ...[+++] of Conduct is broadly seen as appropriate, but stakeholders highlighted the need to improve monitoring and enforcement and to boost the capacity of the Register Secretariat; Specific issues arose in relation to local and regional authorities and their associations who sought to be excluded from the system; The website was positively perceived and the registration/updating process was considered user-friendly.

Regrets that little progress has been made to implement Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 as regards the obligation for the institutions, agencies and other bodies to keep complete registers of documents, as provided for in its Articles 11 and 12 and, ultimately, in the Lisbon Treaty and the Charter of Fundamental Rights; calls for a common approach on registers to be established, and calls on those EU institutions that have not yet established registers of documents to do so, and to implement measures to standardise the classification and presentation of the institutions’ documents; reiterates, in this regard, further to a common access po ...[+++]int to EU documents through the three institutions’ portals, its call for common procedures and criteria for registration and the assignment of an interinstitutional code to each document so that, eventually, a common interinstitutional register, including a dedicated joint database on the state of play of legislative files, could be established.

34. Where repeated non-cooperation, repeated inappropriate behaviour, or serious non-compliance with the code of conduct, has been identified by the JTRS under the procedures referred to in paragraphs 31 to 33, the registrant concerned shall be removed from the register for a time period of either one year or two years and the measure will be publicly mentioned in the register, as laid down in Annex IV.