Translation of "put option clause " (English → French) :

put option clause | put option | put

long put option [ long put | long put position | purchased put option | put buying | put option buying ]

put option on the pound sterling [ pound sterling put option | put option on the British pound | British pound put option ]

strangle [ put and call | put and call option | call and put option | call-and-put option | call and put ]

exchange-traded put | exchange-traded put option | listed put | listed put option

short put | short put option | written put option

long put | long put option | purchased put option

option contract [ call option | option market | put option | traded option | [http ...]

as-you-like option | call-or-put option | chooser option

bond with put option | put bond | putable bond

(c) each put or call option referred to in clause 47.1(4)(a)(iv)(B) or (C) of the Income Tax Act, chapter 148 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1952, as that clause read on January 1, 1986, outstanding under the Plan on that date shall be deemed to have been closed out under the Plan on that date at a cost equal to the amount that the taxpayer would have had to pay on that date if the taxpayer had actually closed out the option on a prescribed stock exchange in Canada on that date;

If we look at option 2, which is similar to what we have, and if we were to put a time limit so that if we have a substitution with a 24-hour clause or a one-meeting clause or whatever, would that deal with the issue that we have at hand?

The question is as follows: With respect to Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Copyright Act: (a) how was this Bill developed; (b) did the government request any specific studies for this Bill and, if so, (i) what was the subject of these studies, (ii) what conclusions did they reach, (iii) what recommendations did they put forward, (iv) what methodology was followed in the studies, (v) on what date were the studies requested, (vi) on what date were the studies submitted, (vii) do the studies contain quantitative analyses (are they supported by data), (viii) what are the quantitative data and in what context are they presented; (c) did the government request an analysis of the Bill’s economic impact on creators’ income and, if so, ...[+++] (i) what options did the analysis offer, (ii) what data were collected as part of the analysis, (iii) what conclusions did the analysis reach, (iv) were the ministers of Canadian Heritage and Industry Canada aware of this analysis before it began, (v) on what date was the analysis requested, (vi) on what date was the analysis tabled, (vii) who or which department requested the analysis, (viii) who or which department conducted the analysis, (ix) what guidelines were issued regarding the analysis, (x) to whom or to which department was the analysis submitted, (xi) did the Minister of Canadian Heritage read the analysis after it was submitted, (xii) did the Minister of Industry read the analysis after it was submitted, (xiii) was a minister or an employee of a minister involved in the analysis, or did a minister or an employee of a minister interact with the researchers at any time during the analysis, (xiv) what methodology was followed in the analysis, (xv) did the author(s) of the analysis state the methodological considerations or limitations, either in writing or verbally, (xvi) what are the methodological considerations or limitations stated by the author(s) of this analysis, (xvii) does the analysis contain a quantitative component (is ...

The Memorandum aims at putting forward proposals to complete the restructuring of the CAP, such as simplifying the current administrative requirements of the cross-compliance rules and the existing framework for State aids, setting a more comprehensive Community database in order to improve Community management of the safeguard clauses in the Common Market Organisations (CMOs), establishing an optional insurance scheme or introducing greater flexibility and efficiency in organising the controls.