Traduction de «regulatory autonomy » (Anglais → Français) :

powers of parliament [ parliamentary power | regulatory autonomy ]

regulatory policy [ better lawmaking | better law-making | better regulation | good regulatory practice | outcome-based regulation | performance-based regulation | REFIT | regulatory fitness | Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme | regulatory governance | regulatory improvement | regulatory quality | regulatory reform | smart regulation ]

ensuring regulatory compliance concerning distribution activities | secure regulatory compliance concerning distribution activities | enable regulatory compliance concerning distribution activities regulatory compliance concerning distribution activities | ensure regulatory compliance concerning distribution activities

assist healthcare users achieve autonomy in daily life activities | assist healthcare users reach autonomy in everyday activity | assist healthcare users achieve autonomy in everyday activities | support healthcare users achieve autonomy in everyday activities

certify products meet regulatory requirements | ensure products meet regulatory requirement | ensure products meet regulatory requirements | guarantee products meet regulatory requirements

autonomy [ local autonomy | regional autonomy ]

Nuclear Regulatory Commission | United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission | US Nuclear Regulatory Commission | NRC [Abbr.] | USNRC [Abbr.]

Committee on Ecodesign and Energy Labelling of Energy–related Products | Committee on the ecodesign and energy labelling of energy-using products | Committee on the Ecodesign of Energy-using Products | Ecodesign Regulatory Committee | Regulatory Committee | Regulatory Committee on the Ecodesign of Energy-related Products

autonomy | local autonomy | regional autonomy

And naturally, any agreement must respect the regulatory autonomy of the EU, as well as the integrity of its legal order.

a new approach to regulatory cooperation, as well as concrete regulatory outcomes in key sectors, while fully respecting the level of protection and regulatory autonomy of each side; and

... whilst fully respecting regulatory autonomy, the establishment of a structured dialogue and cooperation between regulators in the most transparent way possible and involving stakeholders; to include cross-cutting disciplines on regulatory coherence and transparency for the development and implementation of efficient, cost-effective, and more compatible regulations for goods and services; negotiators on both sides need to identify and to be very clear about which technical procedures and standards are fundamental and cannot be compromised, which ones can be the subject of a common approach, which are the areas where mutual recogniti ...[+++]on based on a common high standard and a strong system of market surveillance is desirable and which are those where simply an improved exchange of information is possible, based on the experience of several years of talks in a variety of fora including the Transatlantic Economic Council and the High Level Regulatory Cooperation Forum to ensure similarly that it will not affect standards that have yet to be set in areas where the legislation or the standards are very different in the US as compared with the EU, such as, for example, the implementation of existing (framework) legislation (e.g. REACH), or the adoption of new laws (e.g. cloning), or future definitions affecting the level of protection (e.g. endocrine disrupting chemicals); to ensure that any provisions on regulatory cooperation in the TTIP do not set a procedural requirement for the adoption of Union acts concerned by it nor give rise to enforceable rights in that regard; ...

... whilst fully respecting regulatory autonomy, the establishment of a structured dialogue and cooperation between regulators in the most transparent way possible and involving stakeholders; to include cross-cutting disciplines on regulatory coherence and transparency for the development and implementation of efficient, cost-effective, and more compatible regulations for goods and services; negotiators on both sides need to identify and to be very clear about which technical procedures and standards are fundamental and cannot be compromised, which ones can be the subject of a common approach, which are the areas where mutual recogniti ...[+++]on based on a common high standard and a strong system of market surveillance is desirable and which are those where simply an improved exchange of information is possible, based on the experience of several years of talks in a variety of fora including the Transatlantic Economic Council and the High Level Regulatory Cooperation Forum to ensure similarly that it will not affect standards that have yet to be set in areas where the legislation or the standards are very different in the US as compared with the EU, such as, for example, the implementation of existing (framework) legislation (e.g. REACH), or the adoption of new laws (e.g. cloning), or future definitions affecting the level of protection (e.g. endocrine disrupting chemicals); to ensure that any provisions on regulatory cooperation in the TTIP do not set a procedural requirement for the adoption of Union acts concerned by it nor give rise to enforceable rights in that regard; ...