Traduction de «Bouleversement des climats » (Français → Anglais) :

climate disruption

economic dislocations

Definition: An acute psychotic disorder in which hallucinations, delusions or perceptual disturbances are obvious but markedly variable, changing from day to day or even from hour to hour. Emotional turmoil with intense transient feelings of happiness or ecstasy, or anxiety and irritability, is also frequently present. The polymorphism and instability are characteristic for the overall clinical picture and the psychotic features do not justify a diagnosis of schizophrenia (F20.-). These disorders often have an abrupt onset, developing rapidly within a few days, and they frequently show a rapid resolution of symptoms with no recurrence. I ...[+++]f the symptoms persist the diagnosis should be changed to persistent delusional disorder (F22.-). | Bouffée délirante without symptoms of schizophrenia or unspecified Cycloid psychosis without symptoms of schizophrenia or unspecified

Definition: These are severe disturbances in the personality and behavioural tendencies of the individual; not directly resulting from disease, damage, or other insult to the brain, or from another psychiatric disorder; usually involving several areas of the personality; nearly always associated with considerable personal distress and social disruption; and usually manifest since childhood or adolescence and continuing throughout adulthood.

Society has done a tremendous job in screwing up the climate around the world.

After decades of turmoil, violence has dropped to levels not seen in a generation.

The first challenge, then, is to answer the question that is always the first to be asked of us by the developing countries at international negotiations on climate, and it is this: ‘How, then, do we supply the people – something like two billion of them – who, at present, have no access to electricity, who live in the direst poverty, and who need energy in order to improve the conditions under which they live?’ How, then, do we organise the supply of energy to this segment of the world’s population – consisting of two billion people ...[+++]– without at the same time upsetting the climate?

The economic decisions contained in the Climate and Energy Package, which were made on the grounds of a not-very-credible hypothesis of the cause of climate change, are not only a cynical gibe at common sense, but are also a portent of future economic catastrophe and the upheaval of civilisation.