Traduction de «Code PIN » (Français → Anglais) :

personal identification number | PIN code | PIN [Abbr.]

personal identification number | PIN code | PIN number | PIN [Abbr.]

shortleaf pine | short-leaf pine | shortleaf yellow pine | short-leaved pine | Arkansas pine | North Carolina pine

morphology code M9140 with behaviour code /3

morphology code M905 with behaviour code /3

morphology codes M872-M879 with behaviour code /3

sugar pine | Californian sugar pine | true white pine | Lambert's pine | gigantic pine

corsican pine [ corsican black pine | corsican fir | corsican larch | black pine ]

mugho pine | mugo pine | dwarf pine

It can be as simple as signing an e-mail message with a person’s name or using a PIN-code.

Different rules apply for video-sharing platforms, where the Commission wants to support a co-regulatory approach: the Commission will invite all video-sharing platforms to work within the Alliance to better protect minors online, with an aim to come up with a code of conduct for the industry, while national audiovisual regulators will have the power to enforce the rules. ­require that the most harmful content, such as gratuitous violence and pornography, shall be subject to the strictest measures providing a high degree of control (such as age verification or pin codes). ­encourage EU co-regulation on content descriptors (words or symbo ...[+++]ls warning of bad language, sex, violence, drugs, discrimination) which provide sufficient information to viewers about the possible harmful nature of the content.

The Directive requires a customer to provide minimum two elements categorised as "knowledge" (e.g. a password or a PIN), "possession" (e.g. the card or an authentication code generating device) and "inherence" (e.g. the use of a fingerprint or voice recognition) in order to validate a transaction.

12. Stresses the importance of clear rules on consumer protection policies at European level; believes that further standardisation at European level is needed, in the form of a regulatory framework establishing security standards and transparency of costs for each form of electronic payment (also extending to non-banking service providers) and regulating all the actors involved in the provision of payment services as well as all intermediaries, including merchants (e.g. storage of credentials); believes that when defining standards it is necessary to take account of those systems which have brought about significant shifts towards safer payments (e.g. the CHIPPIN system for cards; two-factor authentication systems; e-signatures and onl ...[+++]ine payments passing through e-payment services), of those systems which are more vulnerable to fraud (e.g. where consumers’ sensitive personal data are transmitted to third parties, as in online payments through overlay services, or the magnetic strip system for cards), and of innovations that could make the processes safer;