Traduction de «Mode de révision de Victoria » (Français → Anglais) :

Where the law of a Member State requires all cooperatives, or a certain type of them, covered by the law of that State to join a legally authorised external body and to submit to a specific system of auditing carried out by that body, the arrangements shall automatically apply to an SCE with its registered office in that Member State provided that this body meets the requirements of Directive 84/253/EEC.

The order of reference read as follows: That the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs be instructed to prepare and bring in a bill, in accordance with Standing Order 68(5), respecting the system of readjusting the boundaries of electoral districts for the House of Commons by Electoral Boundaries Commissions, and, in preparing the said bill, the committee be instructed to consider, among other related matters, the general operation over the past thirty years of the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act, including: (a) a formula to cap or reduce the number of seats in the House of Commons; (b) a review of the adequacy of the ...[+++]present method of selection of members of Electoral Boundary Commissions; (c) a review of the rules governing and the powers and methods of proceeding of Electoral Boundary Commissions, including whether those Commissions ought to commence their work from the basis of making necessary alterations to the boundaries of existing electoral districts wherever possible; (d) a review of the time and nature of the involvement of the public and the House of Commons in the work of Electoral Boundary Commissions; That the committee have the power to travel within Canada and to hear witnesses by teleconference; and That the committee report no later than December 16, 1994 (1105) The order of reference proposed by the government House leader was adopted on Tuesday, April 19, 1994.

The provinces fell in step, as was demonstrated only last June when it was agreed that the requirement to review the amending formula by April 1997 could be met by the Prime Minister and the premiers stating, in the time it took Premier Bouchard to go to the washroom and return to the conference table, that the amending formula study requirement had been met simply by acknowledging the obligation to meet it.

The following should be mentioned, among others, the Declaration on the agricultural guideline (which confirms the principles and mechanisms) and the Declaration on the Balkan situation (which points to a possible revision of the financial perspective in order to cover additional expenditure).

Hon. Allan Rock (for the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) moved: That the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs be instructed to prepare and bring in a bill, in accordance with Standing Order 68(5), respecting the system of readjusting the boundaries of electoral districts for the House of Commons by Electoral Boundaries Commissions, and, in preparing the said bill, the committee be instructed to consider, among other related matters, the general operation over the past thirty years of the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act, including: (a) an assessment of whether there should be a continual increase in th ...[+++]e number of Members of the House of Commons after each census, as now provided in section 51 of the Constitution Act; (b) a review of the adequacy of the present method of selection of members of Electoral Boundaries Commissions; (c) a review of the rules governing and the powers and methods of proceedings of Electoral Boundaries Commissions, including whether these Commissions ought to commence their work from the basis of making necessary alterations to the boundaries of existing electoral districts wherever possible; (d) a review of the time and nature of the involvement of the public and of the House of Commons in the work of Electoral Boundaries Commissions; That the committee have the power to travel within Canada and to hear witnesses by teleconference; and That the committee report no later than December 16, 1994.

It seems to me subclause 3(1) does not make a judgment as to which amending formula, because even if the general amending formula were the correct one, as Professor Woehrling and I both believe—that is to say, the 7-50 formula as opposed to the unanimity formula—negotiations would still have to involve the governments of all the provinces, even though in the end it wouldn't be necessary for all ten of them to agree.