Traduction de «Tenir le procès-verbal » (Français → Anglais) :

Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting

(b) keep minutes of its proceedings; and

Other motions used occasionally include: the purchase of documents (see, for example, Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, Minutes, November 6, 1997, Meeting No. 5); the holding of meetings by videoconference (see, for example, Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development, Minutes, October 30, 1997, Meeting No. 2); the adoption of a general meeting schedule for the committee (see, for example, Standing Committee on Public Accounts, Minutes, October 21, 1997, Meeting No. 3); and working arrangements for lengthy meetings, such as the provision of lunches (see, for example, Standing Committee on Justice an ...[+++]d Human Rights, Minutes, November 6, 1997, Meeting No. 5).

Home Parliamentary Business Senators and Members About Parliament Visitor Information Employment Publications - October 2, 1997 Minutes Options Back to committee meetings MINUTES OF PROCEEDING (Meeting No. 1) Thursday, October 2, 1997 The Standing Committee on Industry met at 9:06 o’clock a.m., this day, in room Room 371, West Block, for the purpose of organization.

See, for example, Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access, Minutes, December 11, 1997, Meeting No. 1; Standing Joint Committee on the Library of Parliament, Minutes, October 28, 1997, Meeting No. 1; Standing Joint Committee on Official Languages, Minutes, October 21,1997, Meeting No. 1; Special Joint Committee on a Code of Conduct, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence, March 20, 1997, Issue No. 1, p. 71.

Also: an explanation that the only portion of our meeting on March 25, 2010, that was published in the official minutes was the body of a motion that had the public meetings and did not mention whose motion it was and that it received all-party support, a fact that could be seen as misleading without the context of the debate that occurred on March 25; an explanation that the public minutes did not mention when the committee would be scheduled or hearing testimony, and that, in fact, there was consensus among the members of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities that this motion would not take precedence ove ...[+++]r the other committee business already discussed; and, a statement that this breach of privilege and/or that a contempt may have occurred in this instance, and a request that action be taken by the House. That is the context of the motion.