Traduction de «droite mortelle » (Français → Anglais) :

The cross-cutting issues referred to in the first subparagraph shall be understood to encompass the following dimensions, to which specific attention shall be given where circumstances so require: non-discrimination, the rights of persons belonging to minorities, the rights of persons with disabilities, the rights of persons with life-threatening diseases and of other vulnerable groups, core labour rights and social inclusion, the empowerment of women, the rule of law, capacity building for parliaments and civil society, and the promotion of dialogue, participation and reconciliation, as well as institution building, including at local a ...[+++]nd regional level.

The cross-cutting issues referred to in the first subparagraph shall be understood to encompass the following dimensions, to which specific attention shall be given where circumstances so require: non-discrimination, the rights of persons belonging to minorities, the rights of persons with disabilities, the rights of persons with life-threatening diseases and of other vulnerable groups, core labour rights and social inclusion, the empowerment of women, the rule of law, capacity building for parliaments and civil society, and the promotion of dialogue, participation and reconciliation, as well as institution building, including at local a ...[+++]nd regional level.

15. Considers that the Commission should give priority to tackling the difficulties brought about by divergences in national procedural law (e.g. in limitation periods and the treatment of foreign law by the courts); suggests, in the light of the key importance of this aspect, that the date for the Commission's report on the functioning of the present EU regime on civil procedural law across borders should be brought forward from 2013 to the end of 2011; urges the Commission to respond to its resolution of 1 February 2007 by present ...[+++]ing a proposal for a common limitation period in cross-border disputes involving personal injuries and fatal accidents as a matter of urgency;

(3) in the case of claims by secondary victims, the date of death or the date of (actual or constructive) knowledge (if later) of the secondary victim (fatal accidents) or the date on which the cause of action accrued or the date of (actual or constructive) knowledge (if later) of the person injured (non-fatal accidents).

Mr. Svend J. Robinson (Burnaby-Kingsway, NDP): Mr. Speaker, the second petition draws to the attention of the House the fact that the current Criminal Code denies people who are suffering from terminal or irreversible and debilitating illness the right to choose freely and voluntarily to end their lives with the assistance of a physician (1515 ) Therefore, petitioners from across British Columbia call on Parliament to amend the Criminal Code to ensure the right of all Canadians to die with dignity by allowing people with terminal or irreversible and debilitating illnesses the right to the assistance of a physician in ending their lives at a time of their choice, subject ...[+++]to strict safeguards to prevent abuse, and to ensure that the decision is free, informed, competent and voluntary.

The B.C. Royal Commission on Health Care and Costs recommended that the provincial government lobby the federal government for changes to the Criminal Code such that the < F14MI> Code< W1> would recognize: the competent adult patient's right to refuse treatment or demand its cessation and that such a right may be exercised by a duly appointed proxy in cases where the patient is not competent; that terminally ill patients be allowed to request fatal doses of pain medication; s.241(b) of the < F255MI> Criminal Code be amended so that aiding the suicide of a terminally ill patient would not be a criminal offence; where consent of a patient is unavailable, the physician should not be under a legal obligation to ...[+++]provide therapeutically useless treatment nor should be criminally liable for the withdrawal of therapeutically useless treatment.