Traduction de «plus de protection » (Français → Anglais) :

17. Stresses that citizens must be able to exercise their data rights free of charge; calls on companies to refrain from any attempts to add unneeded barriers to the right of access, or to amend or delete personal data; stresses that data subjects must be put in a position to know at any time what data have been stored, by whom, when, for what purpose and for what time period, and how they are being processed; emphasises that data subjects must be able to have data deleted, corrected or blocked in an unbureaucratic way and that they must be informed of any misuse of data or data breach; demands also that data be disclosed at the request of the person concerned and deleted, at the latest, when the person requests it; underlines the need ...[+++] to communicate clearly to data subjects the level of data protection in third countries; emphasises that the right of access includes not only full access to processed data about oneself, including its source and recipients, but also intelligible information about the logic involved in any automatic processing; emphasises that the latter will become even more important with profiling and data-mining;

42. Calls on the Commission to ensure that labelling is transparent, easily comprehensible and reliable; considers that an 'EU label', stating, for example, 'produced in accordance with EU animal protection standards', and - for non-complying products - 'not produced in accordance with EU animal protection standards', would already imply a guarantee of compliance with the animal protection standard of a simple and mandatory nature for all products sold in Europe; considers that in the case of protection going beyond that required by the minimum standards, a specific reference on the label would inform the consumer about the additional ...[+++]efforts made by the producer, increase pressure on trading partners to adopt EC animal protection standards and, by doing so, enable Europe to export its animal welfare standards globally; emphasises the role of private labels particularly as regards higher animal welfare standards;

40. Calls on the Commission to ensure that labelling is transparent, easily comprehensible and reliable; considers that an 'EU label' would already imply a guarantee of compliance with the animal protection standard of a simple and mandatory nature for all products sold in Europe; considers that in the case of protection going beyond that required by the minimum standards, a special mention on the label would allow greater visibility to the consumer for additional efforts made by the producer, increase pressure on trading partners to adopt European animal protection standards and standards and, by doing this, enable Europe to export it ...[+++]s animal welfare standards globally; emphasizes the role of private labels particularly as regards higher animal welfare standards;

2. In the Hague Programme of 4-5 November 2004, the European Council acknowledged the need for the EU to contribute, in a spirit of shared responsibility to a more accessible, equitable and effective international protection system in partnership with third countries and to provide access to protection and durable solutions at the earliest possible stage. A distinction was drawn between the differing needs of countries in regions of transit and countries in regions of origin. Countries in regions of origin and transit will be encouraged in their efforts to strengthen their capacity for the protection of refugees. On countries and regions ...[+++] of origin, the European Council further invited the Commission to develop EU Regional Protection Programmes in partnership with the third countries concerned and in close consultation and cooperation with UNHCR. These programmes should build on experience gained in pilot protection programmes to be launched before the end of 2005. These programmes will incorporate a variety of relevant instruments, primarily focused on capacity building, and include a joint resettlement programme for those Member States which may be ready to participate in such a programme on a voluntary basis. With regard to countries of transit, the European Council emphasised the need for intensified cooperation and capacity building, both on the southern and eastern borders of the EU to enable those countries better to manage migration and to provide adequate protection for refugees.

Whilst acknowledging that the EU itself forms a source region for asylum seekers coming from Europe or the wider periphery of Europe, it is vital that other, less developed, source regions are assisted in offering protection to those in need of it as protection in the region is, in principle, the logical and preferred protection modality: it offers protection to persons in need of international protection, as closely as possible to their needs, and at an earlier stage, than protection enjoyed in the EU.

In addition, consumer protection rules at EU level generally allow Member States to take more detailed or stricter measures (through the so-called 'minimum clauses') to protect consumers, or, as is more common, to maintain existing rules, provided they are stricter than the EU rules.