Traduction de «titre subordonné à intérêt progressif » (Français → Anglais) :

progressive interest subordinated note | TSIP [Abbr.]

perpetual floating-rate note [ perpetual floating rate note | perpetual FRN | perpetual floater ]

tiered passbook savings account

perpetual floating rate note | perpetual floating-rate note | perpetual floating rate bond

subject to any defect in title

set-up security

compensation (amount of - payable for the act of expropriation)

fugitive facts file | fugitive material

12. Stresses the importance of access to finance for enterprises, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which constitute the backbone of the EU economy; notes the accommodative monetary policy aimed at boosting investment, and calls for a swift implementation of recent measures, such as the Investment Plan for Europe; notes, in this context, that the currently low interest rates have not been sufficient to boost investment to the extent needed; welcomes at the same time the gradual easing of credit standards ...[+++]on loans to enterprises in the first half of 2015 and the first signs of a pick-up in private investment; underlines the potential of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) project to address these issues, and calls on the Commission to duly take the needs of SMEs into account in the design of the future CMU; calls on the Commission to carry out studies to establish how the regulatory practices rightly introduced as part of the Banking Union process have affected the access of SMEs to banking finance. and, if necessary, to correct the actions concerned;

the horizontal framework should cover compensation only for the actual damage caused, and punitive damages must be prohibited; by virtue of the concept of compensation the damages awarded must be distributed to individual victims in proportion to the harm they sustained individually; by and large, contingency fees are unknown in Europe and should not form part of the mandatory horizontal framework; Access to evidence

27. Notwithstanding anything in the Dominion Lands Act or in any other Act, in the event of a settler who is holding any Dominion land on which a charge has been imposed, constituted or created by or under this or the former Act, hereinafter referred to as “charged land” being in default with respect to the terms or conditions of any agreement of sale, mortgage or other document executed or made with or to the Board, the Minister, upon request made by the Board, may declare the right, title and interest of the settler to or in such charged land to be forfeited, whereupon, and also in the event of the right, title or ...[+++]interest of the settler to or in such charged land becoming forfeited for default in performance of settlement conditions or for any other reason apart from the provisions of this section, the Minister may declare the said right, title or interest of such settler, and also the right, title or interest of His Majesty to or in such charged land, to be vested in the Board, and it may thereafter, subject to the provisions of section twenty-one of this Act, in order to recoup itself for the amount owing by such settler and charged upon such land, sell, lease, exchange or otherwise dispose of such land to a settler, or, with the approval of the Minister, to any other person; but if any surplus is realized beyond the amount required to recoup the Board as aforesaid, such surplus, except as otherwise provided, may be paid by the Board to the settler if he has completed the settlement conditions required for obtaining patent in accordance with the terms of his entry, or to the Receiver General to the credit of the Soldier Land Settlement Assurance Fund if such compliance by the settler with the conditions of his entry has not been established to the satisfaction of the Board.

41. Without prejudice to the international obligations of the EU under the UN Charter, takes the view that the EU and NATO should develop a more intense and effective partnership, taking into account the progressive development of the EU's foreign, security and defence policies while respecting the decision-making autonomy of the two organisations; to that end, recommends a review of the so-called Berlin-Plus arrangements and the development of a more strategic dialogue on shared strategic interests and contingency planning; urges the facilitation of broader practical cooperation on the ground at military or civilian level, in particul ...[+++]ar when both organisations operate in the same theatre of missions; deplores in this respect the continuing clash between Turkey and Cyprus which increasingly undermines the effectiveness and credibility of both the EU and NATO;