Traduction de «Follow-on » (Anglais → Français) :

COMMENCING at the intersection of the limit between the Parish of St-Athanase and the Town of Iberville with the Westerly boundary of Iberville Boulevard; THENCE, following the limit between the Parish of St-Athanase and the Town of Iberville, in a general Southerly direction, to a point: THENCE following the said limit between the Parish of St-Athanase and the Town of Iberville, in a general Westerly direction to its intersection with the Westerly boundary of Iberville Boulevard; THENCE, following the last-mentioned boundary, in a general Southerly direction to its intersection with the lot line between lots 83-1 and 84-1, Parish of S ...[+++]t-Athanase; THENCE, following the last-mentioned lot line and its production, in a general Westerly direction to its intersection with the centre line of Richelieu River being also the County line between the Counties of St-Jean and Iberville; THENCE, following the last-mentioned county line, in a general Northerly direction to its intersection with the production of the limit between the Parish of St-Athanase and the Town of Iberville; THENCE, following the last-mentioned production and the limit between the Parish of St-Athanase and the Town of Iberville, in a general Easterly direction to the Point of Commencement, which lands and part of Richelieu River are shown on Department of Transport plan No. M-3710, dated September 20, 1971.

The top priority was health and education, followed by increased programs to create jobs for young people, followed by programs such as home care and pharmacare, followed by new benefit programs for children in low income families, followed by the new scholarship fund to improve access to education, followed by reduction of debt, and then followed by tax reduction.

‘A contract may not be concluded following the decision to award a contract falling within the scope of Directive 2014/25/EU or Directive 2014/23/EU before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of a period of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned or at least 10 calendar day ...[+++]s with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of the contract award decision’.

‘A contract may not be concluded following the decision to award a contract falling within the scope of Directive 2014/24/EU or Directive 2014/23/EU before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of a period of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned or at least 10 calendar day ...[+++]s with effect from the day following the date of the receipt of the contract award decision’.

The question is as follows: With respect to Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Copyright Act: (a) how was this Bill developed; (b) did the government request any specific studies for this Bill and, if so, (i) what was the subject of these studies, (ii) what conclusions did they reach, (iii) what recommendations did they put forward, (iv) what methodology was followed in the studies, (v) on what date were the studies requested, (vi) on what date were the studies submitted, (vii) do the studies contain quantitative analyses (are they supported by data), (viii) what are the quantitative data and in what context are they presented; (c) did the ...[+++] government request an analysis of the Bill’s economic impact on creators’ income and, if so, (i) what options did the analysis offer, (ii) what data were collected as part of the analysis, (iii) what conclusions did the analysis reach, (iv) were the ministers of Canadian Heritage and Industry Canada aware of this analysis before it began, (v) on what date was the analysis requested, (vi) on what date was the analysis tabled, (vii) who or which department requested the analysis, (viii) who or which department conducted the analysis, (ix) what guidelines were issued regarding the analysis, (x) to whom or to which department was the analysis submitted, (xi) did the Minister of Canadian Heritage read the analysis after it was submitted, (xii) did the Minister of Industry read the analysis after it was submitted, (xiii) was a minister or an employee of a minister involved in the analysis, or did a minister or an employee of a minister interact with the researchers at any time during the analysis, (xiv) what methodology was followed in the analysis, (xv) did the author(s) of the analysis state the methodological considerations or limitations, either in writing or verbally, (xvi) what are the methodological considerations or limitations stated by the author(s) of this analysis, (xvii) does the analysis contain a quantitative component (is ...

2. A contract may not be concluded following the decision to award a contract falling within the scope of this Directive before the expiry of a period of at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned if fax or electronic means are used or, if other means of communication are used, before the expiry of a period of either at least 15 calendar days with effect from the day following the date on which the contract award decision is sent to the tenderers and candidates concerned or at least 10 calendar days with effect from the day f ...[+++]ollowing the date of the receipt of the contract award decision.