Traduction de «residual jurisdiction » (Anglais → Français) :

residual jurisdiction [ residuary jurisdiction | residual power | residuary power | residue of power ]

jurisdiction [ exclusive jurisdiction | jurisdiction of the courts | jurisdiction of the ordinary courts | legal jurisdiction | Competence of tribunals(ECLAS) ]

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

subject-matter jurisdiction [ jurisdiction of the subject matter | jurisdiction of the cause | jurisdiction over the action | jurisdiction ratione materiae | jurisdiction over the subject matter | monetary jurisdiction | competence as to subject matter | ratione materiae jurisdiction | absolute juris ]

personal jurisdiction [ jurisdiction over the person | jurisdiction ratione personae | in personam jurisdiction | jurisdiction in personam | jurisdiction of the person ]

competence in relation to the subject matter | jurisdiction in relation to the subject matter | jurisdiction ratione materiae | jurisdiction related to subject matter | material competence | subject-matter competence | subject-matter jurisdiction

court having jurisdiction | court of competent jurisdiction | court with jurisdiction | forum of jurisdiction

jurisdiction ratione materiae [ subject-matter jurisdiction ]

drug residue [ maximum residue level | maximum residue limit | MRL | veterinary drug residue ]

Finally, the study on residual jurisdiction shows that the absence of harmonised rules determining the cases where the courts of the Member States can decline their jurisdiction on the basis of the Regulation in favour of the courts of third States generates a great deal of confusion and uncertainty.

The study on residual jurisdiction shows that this is particularly the case in situations where a party would not get a fair hearing or adequate protection before the courts of third States.

The scheme introduces a range of innovative features that are new to this jurisdiction such as a finite period for an agreed debt repayment programme, the freezing/reduction of interest and the write-off of residual debt on successful completion of the programme.

The Green Paper and the substantial body of case-law are not the only documentation available: the responses to the Green Paper are available on line and members of the committee have also had the benefit of the various studies carried out for the Commission, namely the Heidelberg report, the study on residual jurisdiction produced by Professor Nuyts and the Study to inform an Impact Assessment on the Ratification of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements by the European Community.